Hybrid Deterministic–Microlevel Model of Normal Contact Stiffness for Textured Surfaces

Normal contact stiffness of textured interfaces is controlled by the load-bearing contribution of deterministic texture and by the nonlinear response of rough load-bearing regions. This study formulates a hybrid deterministic–microlevel model that couples regular relief patterns—including dimples, grooves, periodic ribs and scraped high points—with a micromechanical representation of plateau roughness. Depending on texture topology and scale hierarchy, the microlevel response is represented either by a Greenwood–Williamson (GW) statistical contact model with a smooth elastic–plastic (EP) transition or by a fractal contact model. The deterministic level accounts for open-area fraction, texture depth and load redistribution, and it includes a finite-gauge spectral correction for periodic ribs and grooves to account for the finite measurement window. In a metallic dimple benchmark, the hybrid deterministic-texture/GW–EP formulation yields a mean relative error of 16.3% across all data points in the two selected textured series. In a saturated square-wave benchmark, the finite-gauge spectral correction yields a mean relative error of 10.37% for the independent patterned points. A compliance-based topology criterion is then established to determine, from open-area fraction, element depth, applied load and the ratio between texture period and plateau-roughness spacing, whether stiffness is governed primarily by deterministic texture, by micro-roughness or by their coupled response. The resulting formulation supports early-stage design exploration without requiring a full three-dimensional contact calculation at every parameter point. Independent periodic three-dimensional checks for circular-dimple cells showed that the finest FE solution agreed with the spectral prediction of the deterministic normal approach within 1.2%; the correction estimated by direct unilateral BEM changed total stiffness by no more than approximately 5% in the tested texture-influenced case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lubricants
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants14080289
Primary Topic
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Deterministic–Microlevel Model of Normal Contact Stiffness for Textured Surfaces

K A Bashmur, Alexander V. Zagulyaev
Lubricants
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
article

Hybrid Deterministic–Microlevel Model of Normal Contact Stiffness for Textured Surfaces

K A Bashmur, Alexander V. Zagulyaev
article en

Abstract

Normal contact stiffness of textured interfaces is controlled by the load-bearing contribution of deterministic texture and by the nonlinear response of rough load-bearing regions. This study formulates a hybrid deterministic–microlevel model that couples regular relief patterns—including dimples, grooves, periodic ribs and scraped high points—with a micromechanical representation of plateau roughness. Depending on texture topology and scale hierarchy, the microlevel response is represented either by a Greenwood–Williamson (GW) statistical contact model with a smooth elastic–plastic (EP) transition or by a fractal contact model. The deterministic level accounts for open-area fraction, texture depth and load redistribution, and it includes a finite-gauge spectral correction for periodic ribs and grooves to account for the finite measurement window. In a metallic dimple benchmark, the hybrid deterministic-texture/GW–EP formulation yields a mean relative error of 16.3% across all data points in the two selected textured series. In a saturated square-wave benchmark, the finite-gauge spectral correction yields a mean relative error of 10.37% for the independent patterned points. A compliance-based topology criterion is then established to determine, from open-area fraction, element depth, applied load and the ratio between texture period and plateau-roughness spacing, whether stiffness is governed primarily by deterministic texture, by micro-roughness or by their coupled response. The resulting formulation supports early-stage design exploration without requiring a full three-dimensional contact calculation at every parameter point. Independent periodic three-dimensional checks for circular-dimple cells showed that the finest FE solution agreed with the spectral prediction of the deterministic normal approach within 1.2%; the correction estimated by direct unilateral BEM changed total stiffness by no more than approximately 5% in the tested texture-influenced case.

LubricantsVol. 14(8)
Siberian Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hybrid Deterministic–Microlevel Model of Normal Contact Stiffness for Textured Surfaces — K A Bashmur, Alexander V. Zagulyaev · Lubricants (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS