Surface battles: Applying, erasing and conserving graffiti on the Colston statue, 1998 to the present

This article examines the surfaces of contested heritage objects through a case study of the ‘surface battles’ waged on the statue of Edward Colston (1636–1721) in Bristol, England. It uncovers histories of the application, removal and conservation of graffiti from the surface of the statue and plinth from 1998 to the present. In part, this signals the ways that graffiti has remade the object. But it also points to the changing meanings given to graffiti once the statue was toppled, with the decision to make these ephemeral additions permanent. Critical here was the de-coupling of plinth and statue, with the latter seen, officially at least, as public art object in the urban streetscape and the former historical object in a museum, although such thinking was not shared by all. Focusing on surface battles on contested statues raises the broader question of whether surfaces offer the potential for democratising the monument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Material Culture
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835261472326
Primary Topic
Public Spaces through Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface battles: Applying, erasing and conserving graffiti on the Colston statue, 1998 to the present

Tim Cole
Journal of Material Culture
Public Spaces through Art
article

Surface battles: Applying, erasing and conserving graffiti on the Colston statue, 1998 to the present

Tim Cole
article en

Abstract

This article examines the surfaces of contested heritage objects through a case study of the ‘surface battles’ waged on the statue of Edward Colston (1636–1721) in Bristol, England. It uncovers histories of the application, removal and conservation of graffiti from the surface of the statue and plinth from 1998 to the present. In part, this signals the ways that graffiti has remade the object. But it also points to the changing meanings given to graffiti once the statue was toppled, with the decision to make these ephemeral additions permanent. Critical here was the de-coupling of plinth and statue, with the latter seen, officially at least, as public art object in the urban streetscape and the former historical object in a museum, although such thinking was not shared by all. Focusing on surface battles on contested statues raises the broader question of whether surfaces offer the potential for democratising the monument.

Journal of Material Culture
University of Bristol (GB)
Vetenskapsrådet
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Spaces through Art
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.