Computational Insights into Polymer Binder–Graphene Interfaces: Chitosan-Functionalized Graphene Oxide as a Sustainable Platform for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Developing sustainable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) requires binder–carbon interfaces that combine mechanical compatibility, interfacial cohesion, and reduced environmental impact. In this work, density functional theory calculations were used to evaluate the interactions of representative binder monomers acrylonitrile (AN), pyrrole (PY), vinylidene fluoride (VDF), and tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) with pristine graphene and chitosan-functionalized graphene oxide (GO/chitosan). Structural, energetic, electronic, and topological features were analyzed using counterpoise-corrected interaction energies, frontier-orbital descriptors, molecular electrostatic potential maps, projected density of states, noncovalent interaction analysis, and quantum theory of atoms in molecules topology. Final interaction energies were obtained at the M06-2X/def2-TZVP level with Boys–Bernardi counterpoise correction to provide a more robust description of weak noncovalent adsorption. Most binder–surface interactions fall within a weak, near-thermoneutral adsorption regime. On pristine graphene, AN and PY exhibit weakly favorable adsorption, with minimum counterpoise-corrected interaction energies of −3.13 and −2.10 kcal mol−1, respectively, whereas TFE and VDF show orientation-dependent, near-neutral behavior. GO/chitosan introduces oxygen-containing and amino functionalities that modify the adsorption balance, particularly for selected perpendicular configurations of fluorinated monomers, although the net stabilization remains modest. NCI, QTAIM, MEP, and PDOS analyses indicate that surface functionalization increases the chemical heterogeneity and directionality of local contacts; however, these local descriptors do not necessarily translate into strong global adsorption energies. Overall, the results identify GO/chitosan as a chemically tunable interface for binder–carbon compatibility in LIB electrodes and demonstrate the importance of triple-ζ, counterpoise-corrected calculations for evaluating weak binder–surface interactions.