Population Density Patterns of Dominant Mice and Voles in a Forest–Meadow Ecotone

Abstract The relative roles of environmental filtering and competition in structuring assemblages of ecologically similar rodents remain poorly understood. We examined population density patterns of mice and voles on the Prikhankaya Plain to identify habitat preferences and the factors shaping species coexistence. Population densities of harvest mouse, gray red-backed vole, and northern red-backed vole—and likely those of Korean field mouse and striped field mouse—were associated with heat and moisture availability. In contrast, competition did not appear to influence assemblage structure under current conditions. The mechanisms underlying these patterns and potential responses of the assemblage to global environmental change are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Problems of Ecology
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1995425526700241
Primary Topic
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Population Density Patterns of Dominant Mice and Voles in a Forest–Meadow Ecotone

I. S. Sheremetev, И. Н. Шереметьева, V. A. Nesterenko
Contemporary Problems of Ecology
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
article

Population Density Patterns of Dominant Mice and Voles in a Forest–Meadow Ecotone

I. S. Sheremetev, И. Н. Шереметьева, V. A. Nesterenko
article en

Abstract

Abstract The relative roles of environmental filtering and competition in structuring assemblages of ecologically similar rodents remain poorly understood. We examined population density patterns of mice and voles on the Prikhankaya Plain to identify habitat preferences and the factors shaping species coexistence. Population densities of harvest mouse, gray red-backed vole, and northern red-backed vole—and likely those of Korean field mouse and striped field mouse—were associated with heat and moisture availability. In contrast, competition did not appear to influence assemblage structure under current conditions. The mechanisms underlying these patterns and potential responses of the assemblage to global environmental change are discussed.

Contemporary Problems of EcologyVol. 19(4)
Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity FEB RAS (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.