Woven Trust: Consensus and Governance Anchored in Verifiable Reputation

Harlequin is a blockchain protocol in which the right to take part in consensus, governance and adjudication comes solely from reputation earned by verifiable acts — never from capital (proof of stake) or expended computation (proof of work). Reputation is a four-dimensional quantity ("the four suits"), computed deterministically from a public evidence record by a damped trust-propagation function, aggregated conservatively (a strong dimension cannot buy authority in a weak one), and subject to time decay so that standing must be continually re-earned. Block authorship and committee/jury membership are assigned by reputation-weighted cryptographic sortition; finality is provided by a Byzantine-safe gadget over signed votes; disputes are judged by sortitioned juries with interest-exclusion, and the only enforced consequence is reputational — the protocol applies no coercive force. We give the system model, the consensus and justice mechanisms, and a security analysis against a state-level adversary whose goal is capture, censorship or de-anonymization rather than direct theft. Two results are emphasized for their honesty. First, steady-state Sybil resistance is strong: a Sybil farm without earned evidence obtains about 0% of consensus power (17/17 adversarial tests). Second, the cold-start window is not unconditionally safe: a competent adversary present at genesis can capture the bootstrap; we show the security of that window is a race between honest onboarding and adversary mass — bounded, not eliminated, by non-operator personhood verification, an automatic ceiling-halt and the onboarding rate, with the residual risk declared. We report an implementation in Rust (dependency-free cores cross-validated against FRAME pallets) and a reproducible validation record spanning unit tests and multi-node hardware runs. v3 — post-launch revision. The network described here is no longer a design: the chain launched on 18 July 2026, with its genesis seed anchored to Bitcoin block 958536, and has been sealing blocks under the mechanisms this paper describes since. This revision corrects the emission schedule (per-era public ratios: 15/16 for HLQ, 3/4 for SOV, decoupled from the reputational decay constant), documents the launch facts and the first on-chain runtime upgrade executed through the paper's governance mechanism, and updates the evaluation with the live chain's validation record. Both English and Spanish editions are included; the English edition is the primary text.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21610574
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Woven Trust: Consensus and Governance Anchored in Verifiable Reputation

Harlequin Project
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Woven Trust: Consensus and Governance Anchored in Verifiable Reputation

Harlequin Project
article en

Abstract

Harlequin is a blockchain protocol in which the right to take part in consensus, governance and adjudication comes solely from reputation earned by verifiable acts — never from capital (proof of stake) or expended computation (proof of work). Reputation is a four-dimensional quantity ("the four suits"), computed deterministically from a public evidence record by a damped trust-propagation function, aggregated conservatively (a strong dimension cannot buy authority in a weak one), and subject to time decay so that standing must be continually re-earned. Block authorship and committee/jury membership are assigned by reputation-weighted cryptographic sortition; finality is provided by a Byzantine-safe gadget over signed votes; disputes are judged by sortitioned juries with interest-exclusion, and the only enforced consequence is reputational — the protocol applies no coercive force. We give the system model, the consensus and justice mechanisms, and a security analysis against a state-level adversary whose goal is capture, censorship or de-anonymization rather than direct theft. Two results are emphasized for their honesty. First, steady-state Sybil resistance is strong: a Sybil farm without earned evidence obtains about 0% of consensus power (17/17 adversarial tests). Second, the cold-start window is not unconditionally safe: a competent adversary present at genesis can capture the bootstrap; we show the security of that window is a race between honest onboarding and adversary mass — bounded, not eliminated, by non-operator personhood verification, an automatic ceiling-halt and the onboarding rate, with the residual risk declared. We report an implementation in Rust (dependency-free cores cross-validated against FRAME pallets) and a reproducible validation record spanning unit tests and multi-node hardware runs. v3 — post-launch revision. The network described here is no longer a design: the chain launched on 18 July 2026, with its genesis seed anchored to Bitcoin block 958536, and has been sealing blocks under the mechanisms this paper describes since. This revision corrects the emission schedule (per-era public ratios: 15/16 for HLQ, 3/4 for SOV, decoupled from the reputational decay constant), documents the launch facts and the first on-chain runtime upgrade executed through the paper's governance mechanism, and updates the evaluation with the live chain's validation record. Both English and Spanish editions are included; the English edition is the primary text.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.