Shapley Value for A Differential Game of Monetary and Fiscal Economic Policy

This paper implements a dynamically stable cooperative mechanism for allocating economic-policy costs between fiscal and monetary authorities in the context of public debt stabilization. The mechanism is implemented in the debt-stabilization game proposed by Tabellini [1986] [Money, debt and deficits in a dynamic game, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 10(4), 427–442] and computed using the algorithm developed by Petrosyan and Zaccour [2003] [Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 27(3), 381–398]. Based on the resulting parameter equations, two institutional settings are considered: first, a setting in which both authorities are equally sensitive — in absolute terms — to movements in public debt; and second, a setting in which the monetary authority is fully conservative, assigning no weight to public debt dynamics, while the fiscal authority does. The main findings are as follows. (i) A higher discount factor slows down the adjustment of public debt toward its steady state. (ii) A larger joint weight attached to public debt speeds up the adjustment of public debt. (iii) Under the first institutional setting, both authorities share the economic-policy costs equally, and this allocation lies between the two asymmetric allocations obtained in the second setting, where the monetary authority bears lower costs than the fiscal authority. (iv) Under the first setting, both authorities face lower long-run economic-policy costs when the tension in the economic-policy environment is smaller.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Game Theory Review
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219198926500155
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shapley Value for A Differential Game of Monetary and Fiscal Economic Policy

Andrés F. Russi
International Game Theory Review
Economic theories and models
article

Shapley Value for A Differential Game of Monetary and Fiscal Economic Policy

Andrés F. Russi
article en

Abstract

This paper implements a dynamically stable cooperative mechanism for allocating economic-policy costs between fiscal and monetary authorities in the context of public debt stabilization. The mechanism is implemented in the debt-stabilization game proposed by Tabellini [1986] [Money, debt and deficits in a dynamic game, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 10(4), 427–442] and computed using the algorithm developed by Petrosyan and Zaccour [2003] [Time-consistent Shapley value allocation of pollution cost reduction, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 27(3), 381–398]. Based on the resulting parameter equations, two institutional settings are considered: first, a setting in which both authorities are equally sensitive — in absolute terms — to movements in public debt; and second, a setting in which the monetary authority is fully conservative, assigning no weight to public debt dynamics, while the fiscal authority does. The main findings are as follows. (i) A higher discount factor slows down the adjustment of public debt toward its steady state. (ii) A larger joint weight attached to public debt speeds up the adjustment of public debt. (iii) Under the first institutional setting, both authorities share the economic-policy costs equally, and this allocation lies between the two asymmetric allocations obtained in the second setting, where the monetary authority bears lower costs than the fiscal authority. (iv) Under the first setting, both authorities face lower long-run economic-policy costs when the tension in the economic-policy environment is smaller.

International Game Theory Review
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Economic theories and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.