Evolution, trends, and research frontiers of multi-criteria decision-making in sustainability: Analyses of articles (1993–2025)

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) has been successful in managing the complex trade-offs in sustainability challenges. Despite numerous studies combining MCDM and sustainability, no thorough bibliometric study has mapped the development, structure, and key areas of this field from its beginnings to now. This study fills that gap by performing a large-scale bibliometric analysis of 16,970 articles published between 1993 and 2025, retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (SCI-Expanded and SSCI). By using Bibliometrix (biblioshiny) and VOSviewer, annual scientific output, distribution of sources, author productivity and collaboration, contributions from institutions and countries, keyword co-occurrence, thematic mapping, co-citation networks, and bibliographic coupling are evaluated. The results show a notable 28.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), indicating that the field remains firmly in its growth phase, with 42.2% of anticipated saturation. China leads in output, followed by India, Iran, Turkey, and Spain. Dragan Pamucar, Liu Y., and Kumar A. rise as the most productive authors, while Kannan Govindan ranks among the most influential. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are the main methods, while fuzzy extensions make up the largest thematic cluster, which is 26.4% of the total. Thematic mapping identifies AHP combined with geographic information systems (GIS) as a niche motor theme, along with new areas such as green hydrogen, Industry 5.0, machine learning hybridization, and spatiotemporal MCDM approaches. Co-citation analysis links the intellectual foundations to Lotfi A Zadeh (1965), Saaty (1977, 1980), and Opricovic and Tzeng (2004). These outcomes provide solid evidence for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to navigate the MCDM-sustainability connection and find productive paths for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Sustainability
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxsust.2026.100423
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution, trends, and research frontiers of multi-criteria decision-making in sustainability: Analyses of articles (1993–2025)

Mehmet Şahin
Next Sustainability
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Evolution, trends, and research frontiers of multi-criteria decision-making in sustainability: Analyses of articles (1993–2025)

Mehmet Şahin
article en

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) has been successful in managing the complex trade-offs in sustainability challenges. Despite numerous studies combining MCDM and sustainability, no thorough bibliometric study has mapped the development, structure, and key areas of this field from its beginnings to now. This study fills that gap by performing a large-scale bibliometric analysis of 16,970 articles published between 1993 and 2025, retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (SCI-Expanded and SSCI). By using Bibliometrix (biblioshiny) and VOSviewer, annual scientific output, distribution of sources, author productivity and collaboration, contributions from institutions and countries, keyword co-occurrence, thematic mapping, co-citation networks, and bibliographic coupling are evaluated. The results show a notable 28.5% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), indicating that the field remains firmly in its growth phase, with 42.2% of anticipated saturation. China leads in output, followed by India, Iran, Turkey, and Spain. Dragan Pamucar, Liu Y., and Kumar A. rise as the most productive authors, while Kannan Govindan ranks among the most influential. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are the main methods, while fuzzy extensions make up the largest thematic cluster, which is 26.4% of the total. Thematic mapping identifies AHP combined with geographic information systems (GIS) as a niche motor theme, along with new areas such as green hydrogen, Industry 5.0, machine learning hybridization, and spatiotemporal MCDM approaches. Co-citation analysis links the intellectual foundations to Lotfi A Zadeh (1965), Saaty (1977, 1980), and Opricovic and Tzeng (2004). These outcomes provide solid evidence for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to navigate the MCDM-sustainability connection and find productive paths for future research.

Next SustainabilityVol. 8
İskenderun Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evolution, trends, and research frontiers of multi-criteria decision-making in sustainability: Analyses of articles (1993–2025) — Mehmet Şahin · Next Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS