De‐escalating radical surgery for select <scp>FIGO</scp> Stage I cervical cancer

Four recent prospective trials demonstrated that de-escalation of radical surgery for select patients with apparent low-risk, FIGO Stage I cervical cancer does not compromise cancer-related survival but does improve quality of life and provide the opportunity to preserve fertility. We present a critical review of ConCerv, SHAPE, GOG-278, and LESSER, which have set the stage for de-escalation of surgery for low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. ConCerv, a prospective phase II study evaluating the feasibility and oncologic outcomes of conization alone or simple hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma, found a low recurrence rate of 2.4% in patients who underwent a cone biopsy with lymph node assessment and 0% in those who underwent simple hysterectomy with lymph node evaluation. SHAPE, a phase III trial assessing the safety of simple hysterectomy compared to radical hysterectomy in this patient population, showed no difference in pelvic recurrences between both groups. GOG-278, an international cohort study evaluating the efficacy of cone biopsy versus simple hysterectomy with pelvic nodal assessment, found a 3-year recurrence-free survival rate of 94.8% in the cone biopsy group, with no recurrences noted in the simple hysterectomy group. Finally, LESSER, a phase II proof-of-concept trial studying cancer and quality-of-life outcomes in patients who underwent either a simple or modified radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer, found no difference in the disease-free survival rate or overall survival between both groups. Rates of postoperative complications were also similar in both arms. Based on these trials, we propose the following set of criteria for which de-escalation of surgical intervention would be appropriate for select Stage I disease: tumors ≤2 cm on cone biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging showing <50% of cervical stromal invasion with no evidence of metastasis; and a histology of either squamous cell carcinoma of any grade or either grade 1 or 2 adenocarcinoma, with depth of invasion <10 mm and no lymphovascular invasion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71230
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De‐escalating radical surgery for select FIGO Stage I cervical cancer

Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Sarikapan Wilailak, René Pareja, Angélica Fletcher et al.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

De‐escalating radical surgery for select FIGO Stage I cervical cancer

Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Sarikapan Wilailak, René Pareja, Angélica Fletcher, Sara Moufarrij
article en

Abstract

Four recent prospective trials demonstrated that de-escalation of radical surgery for select patients with apparent low-risk, FIGO Stage I cervical cancer does not compromise cancer-related survival but does improve quality of life and provide the opportunity to preserve fertility. We present a critical review of ConCerv, SHAPE, GOG-278, and LESSER, which have set the stage for de-escalation of surgery for low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. ConCerv, a prospective phase II study evaluating the feasibility and oncologic outcomes of conization alone or simple hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma, found a low recurrence rate of 2.4% in patients who underwent a cone biopsy with lymph node assessment and 0% in those who underwent simple hysterectomy with lymph node evaluation. SHAPE, a phase III trial assessing the safety of simple hysterectomy compared to radical hysterectomy in this patient population, showed no difference in pelvic recurrences between both groups. GOG-278, an international cohort study evaluating the efficacy of cone biopsy versus simple hysterectomy with pelvic nodal assessment, found a 3-year recurrence-free survival rate of 94.8% in the cone biopsy group, with no recurrences noted in the simple hysterectomy group. Finally, LESSER, a phase II proof-of-concept trial studying cancer and quality-of-life outcomes in patients who underwent either a simple or modified radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer, found no difference in the disease-free survival rate or overall survival between both groups. Rates of postoperative complications were also similar in both arms. Based on these trials, we propose the following set of criteria for which de-escalation of surgical intervention would be appropriate for select Stage I disease: tumors ≤2 cm on cone biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging showing <50% of cervical stromal invasion with no evidence of metastasis; and a histology of either squamous cell carcinoma of any grade or either grade 1 or 2 adenocarcinoma, with depth of invasion <10 mm and no lymphovascular invasion.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Gynecologic Oncology Group (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Cornell University (US), Mahidol University (TH), Clínica Somer (CO), Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (CO), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.