Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft Surgery status Among Children With Cleft Alveolus From the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate

Objective Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is a key surgical intervention for children with cleft alveolus. We aim to estimate the cumulative probability of bone regrafting after SABG and assess associated clinical predictive factors. Design Registry-based study. Setting National registry-based study using the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate (NRCLP), covering cleft care in Norway, 2011 to 2024. Patients/Participants Children with cleft alveolus recorded in the NRCLP (n = 590). Interventions Secondary alveolar bone grafting and any subsequent regrafting within the cleft care. Main outcome measure(s) Bone regrafting cumulative probability after SABG, based on 2-dimensional radiographic Bergland classification system, and its associations with sex, center of treatment, palate involvement, cleft side, and cleft type. Results Of 590 children, 398 (67%) were boys. Unilateral cleft alveolus (with/without cleft palate) was identified among 479 (81%) children. A total of 178 (30%) had cleft lip and alveolus only, and 412 (70%) had cleft lip and alveolus with cleft palate. Secondary alveolar bone grafting was performed in 219 clefts among 191 children. The mean age at first SABG was 9.8 ± 1.1 years. Fourteen children (7%) underwent regrafting. The cumulative probability of regrafting was 10% (95% confidence interval, 6%-16%) up to 6 years of follow-up. Regrafting was not significantly associated with sex, palate involvement, cleft side, or cleft type ( P > .05). It was associated with the center of treatment ( P = .015). Conclusions Regrafting cumulative probability after SABG was low. No significant associations were identified with the cleft characteristics examined. Variation between centers warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261470549
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft Surgery status Among Children With Cleft Alveolus From the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate

Abass SM, Mohammed A. Yassin, Paul Sæle, Åse Sivertsen et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft Surgery status Among Children With Cleft Alveolus From the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate

Abass SM, Mohammed A. Yassin, Paul Sæle, Åse Sivertsen, Stein Atle Lie, Ragnar Bjering, Osman Elrayah Osman
article en

Abstract

Objective Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is a key surgical intervention for children with cleft alveolus. We aim to estimate the cumulative probability of bone regrafting after SABG and assess associated clinical predictive factors. Design Registry-based study. Setting National registry-based study using the Norwegian Registry of Cleft Lip and Palate (NRCLP), covering cleft care in Norway, 2011 to 2024. Patients/Participants Children with cleft alveolus recorded in the NRCLP (n = 590). Interventions Secondary alveolar bone grafting and any subsequent regrafting within the cleft care. Main outcome measure(s) Bone regrafting cumulative probability after SABG, based on 2-dimensional radiographic Bergland classification system, and its associations with sex, center of treatment, palate involvement, cleft side, and cleft type. Results Of 590 children, 398 (67%) were boys. Unilateral cleft alveolus (with/without cleft palate) was identified among 479 (81%) children. A total of 178 (30%) had cleft lip and alveolus only, and 412 (70%) had cleft lip and alveolus with cleft palate. Secondary alveolar bone grafting was performed in 219 clefts among 191 children. The mean age at first SABG was 9.8 ± 1.1 years. Fourteen children (7%) underwent regrafting. The cumulative probability of regrafting was 10% (95% confidence interval, 6%-16%) up to 6 years of follow-up. Regrafting was not significantly associated with sex, palate involvement, cleft side, or cleft type ( P > .05). It was associated with the center of treatment ( P = .015). Conclusions Regrafting cumulative probability after SABG was low. No significant associations were identified with the cleft characteristics examined. Variation between centers warrants further investigation.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Khartoum (SD), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), University of Bergen (NO), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.