Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma initiating their second, third, and fourth lines of treatment: data from the US Flatiron database

This study assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received second- (2 L), third- (3 L), and fourth-line (4 L) treatments. Among 3910 patients who received 2 L treatment, 42.6% and 20.4% went on to receive 3 L and 4 L treatment, respectively. Median age of patients who received 2 L treatment was 70 years. Before 2 L treatment, most patients had exposure to bortezomib (77.0%) and lenalidomide (70.0%). The most common 2 L regimens (±dexamethasone) were daratumumab + pomalidomide (7.7%), daratumumab + lenalidomide (7.6%), and daratumumab + bortezomib (6.0%); daratumumab + pomalidomide was most common in 3 L (11.3%) and 4 L (8.3%). Median progression-free survival was 13.8, 8.1, and 7.0 months and median overall survival was 61.3, 39.9, and 30.7 months in 2 L, 3 L, and 4 L, respectively. By multivariable Cox regression, worse-outcome predictors included higher International Staging System stage, frailty, high cytogenetic risk, and triple-class refractoriness. Overall, real-world treatment patterns for RRMM were heterogeneous, and new therapies are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2026.2702128
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma initiating their second, third, and fourth lines of treatment: data from the US Flatiron database

Christian Gentili, Ying Qiu, Jiaqi Fang, G. Rivera et al.
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma initiating their second, third, and fourth lines of treatment: data from the US Flatiron database

Christian Gentili, Ying Qiu, Jiaqi Fang, G. Rivera, Maria J. Nieto, Yu-Hsuan Shih
article en

Abstract

This study assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received second- (2 L), third- (3 L), and fourth-line (4 L) treatments. Among 3910 patients who received 2 L treatment, 42.6% and 20.4% went on to receive 3 L and 4 L treatment, respectively. Median age of patients who received 2 L treatment was 70 years. Before 2 L treatment, most patients had exposure to bortezomib (77.0%) and lenalidomide (70.0%). The most common 2 L regimens (±dexamethasone) were daratumumab + pomalidomide (7.7%), daratumumab + lenalidomide (7.6%), and daratumumab + bortezomib (6.0%); daratumumab + pomalidomide was most common in 3 L (11.3%) and 4 L (8.3%). Median progression-free survival was 13.8, 8.1, and 7.0 months and median overall survival was 61.3, 39.9, and 30.7 months in 2 L, 3 L, and 4 L, respectively. By multivariable Cox regression, worse-outcome predictors included higher International Staging System stage, frailty, high cytogenetic risk, and triple-class refractoriness. Overall, real-world treatment patterns for RRMM were heterogeneous, and new therapies are needed.

Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) (DE), Bristol-Myers Squibb (France) (FR), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US), Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Switzerland) (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.