Testing a Novel Transfer Learning Approach to Estimate War-Related Crop Yield Losses in Ukraine

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has posed serious risks to global food security, by causing substantial crop yield losses since 2022. Accurate yield estimation helps policymakers to plan compensation, yet modelling yields in conflict regions remains challenging due to significant non-meteorological disruptions. This study proposes a novel framework to quantify war-related crop yield losses by comparing estimations derived from meteorological data, representing weather-driven yield variability, with those based on Earth observation (EO) data, reflecting actual crop conditions influenced by both weather and conflict. Thus, meteorologically based yield estimates are expected to exceed those derived from EO data, with the difference indicating war-related losses. Both, meteorological- and EO-based models, are developed using transfer learning (TL) to estimate yields of maize, winter wheat, and spring barley. Models are initially trained on EU country data and subsequently finetuned with Ukrainian data. Their performance is compared to two non-TL approaches: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to test their reliability. Results show crop yield losses for maize; however, since we do not detect losses in the other crops, we conclude that simply comparing meteorological- and EO-based models proves insufficient to fully isolate conflict effects due to strong interactions of EO and meteorological data. Nevertheless, TL substantially enhances prediction accuracy (R2 around 0.7), exceeding alternative models by 0.05–0.2 across crops. These findings demonstrate the value of TL for yield modelling in data-scarce environments and underscore the need for improved methodologies to quantify conflict-induced agricultural losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18152465
Primary Topic
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing a Novel Transfer Learning Approach to Estimate War-Related Crop Yield Losses in Ukraine

A.V. Bykin, Mislav Anić, Oleg Drozdivskyi, Lívia Labudová et al.
Remote Sensing
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
article

Testing a Novel Transfer Learning Approach to Estimate War-Related Crop Yield Losses in Ukraine

A.V. Bykin, Mislav Anić, Oleg Drozdivskyi, Lívia Labudová, Markéta Poděbradská, Wouter Dorigo, Lukáš Dolák, Emanuel Büechi, Svitlana Kokhan
article en

Abstract

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has posed serious risks to global food security, by causing substantial crop yield losses since 2022. Accurate yield estimation helps policymakers to plan compensation, yet modelling yields in conflict regions remains challenging due to significant non-meteorological disruptions. This study proposes a novel framework to quantify war-related crop yield losses by comparing estimations derived from meteorological data, representing weather-driven yield variability, with those based on Earth observation (EO) data, reflecting actual crop conditions influenced by both weather and conflict. Thus, meteorologically based yield estimates are expected to exceed those derived from EO data, with the difference indicating war-related losses. Both, meteorological- and EO-based models, are developed using transfer learning (TL) to estimate yields of maize, winter wheat, and spring barley. Models are initially trained on EU country data and subsequently finetuned with Ukrainian data. Their performance is compared to two non-TL approaches: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to test their reliability. Results show crop yield losses for maize; however, since we do not detect losses in the other crops, we conclude that simply comparing meteorological- and EO-based models proves insufficient to fully isolate conflict effects due to strong interactions of EO and meteorological data. Nevertheless, TL substantially enhances prediction accuracy (R2 around 0.7), exceeding alternative models by 0.05–0.2 across crops. These findings demonstrate the value of TL for yield modelling in data-scarce environments and underscore the need for improved methodologies to quantify conflict-induced agricultural losses.

Remote SensingVol. 18(15)
Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service (HR), TU Wien (AT), Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA), National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Masaryk University (CZ), Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SK), Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute (CZ), Scientific Centre for Aerospace Research of the Earth (UA)
European Space Agency
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.