Why Look at Endangered Animals? Dualism, Archival Desire, and the Visual Culture of Extinction

This article examines endangered-animal photography as a prominent and often unquestioned form of conservation visual culture. Focusing on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and Joel Sartore’s Photo Ark, it considers how photographs of endangered animals move between scientific documentation, emotional appeal, archival preservation, and conservation publicity. Framed through Val Plumwood’s analysis of human/nature dualism and its objectifying structures, this analysis argues that such images can render nonhuman life knowable as an object of human classification and intervention. While conservation photography can generate attention and concern, it can easily reproduce dualistic patterns by isolating animals from ecological relations, framing them as passive objects of visual knowledge and management, and substituting symbolic preservation for ecological understanding and protection. A less dualistic conservation visuality would not abandon endangered animals as photographic subjects, but instead situate them within the damaged, interdependent, and politically produced worlds that shape their vulnerability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arts
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15080169
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Look at Endangered Animals? Dualism, Archival Desire, and the Visual Culture of Extinction

Philip Charrier
Arts
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Why Look at Endangered Animals? Dualism, Archival Desire, and the Visual Culture of Extinction

Philip Charrier
article en

Abstract

This article examines endangered-animal photography as a prominent and often unquestioned form of conservation visual culture. Focusing on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and Joel Sartore’s Photo Ark, it considers how photographs of endangered animals move between scientific documentation, emotional appeal, archival preservation, and conservation publicity. Framed through Val Plumwood’s analysis of human/nature dualism and its objectifying structures, this analysis argues that such images can render nonhuman life knowable as an object of human classification and intervention. While conservation photography can generate attention and concern, it can easily reproduce dualistic patterns by isolating animals from ecological relations, framing them as passive objects of visual knowledge and management, and substituting symbolic preservation for ecological understanding and protection. A less dualistic conservation visuality would not abandon endangered animals as photographic subjects, but instead situate them within the damaged, interdependent, and politically produced worlds that shape their vulnerability.

ArtsVol. 15(8)
University of Regina (CA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why Look at Endangered Animals? Dualism, Archival Desire, and the Visual Culture of Extinction — Philip Charrier · Arts (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS