Parental perspectives on clinician guidance in value-laden NICU conversations: a qualitative study

Abstract Background Value-laden decisions about life-sustaining treatment for critically ill infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) present profound emotional and ethical challenges for parents and clinicians. In such situations, clinicians must balance providing guidance with respecting parental autonomy. We explored parental perspectives on clinician guidance and effective communication during these decisions. Methods We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis within a randomized clinical trial using parental free-text responses to a simulated neonatal decision-making scenario. The study was carried out online between February and April 2024 in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. Eligible participants were German-speaking parents of preterm infants with prior NICU experience, recruited through patient and parent organizations. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results Among 128 participants (84% female), parents emphasized the importance of clear, detailed, and evidence-based information about their child’s condition and treatment options, as well as empathetic, honest, and individualized communication. They valued sufficient time for discussion and reflection, access to second opinions, and attention to the child’s quality of life. Parents appeared to retain a sense of decision ownership, while differing in their preferences regarding clinician guidance. Some welcomed explicit recommendations, whereas others preferred neutral, value-sensitive communication that preserved space for independent deliberation. Conclusions Parents facing complex medical decisions value both high-quality information and empathetic and honest communication. While they generally retain decision ownership, preferences regarding clinician guidance vary, suggesting that clinicians should actively explore how much direction parents want and tailor their communication accordingly. Trial registration ISRCTN registry under number ISRCTN16123073, registration date: 17/01/2024, ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16123073 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-07-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-07304-5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental perspectives on clinician guidance in value-laden NICU conversations: a qualitative study

André Kidszun, Christine Arnold, Sophie Jaisli, Stephanie Vanessa Schmid et al.
BMC Pediatrics
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

Parental perspectives on clinician guidance in value-laden NICU conversations: a qualitative study

André Kidszun, Christine Arnold, Sophie Jaisli, Stephanie Vanessa Schmid, Julian Eychmüller, Dina Hediger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Value-laden decisions about life-sustaining treatment for critically ill infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) present profound emotional and ethical challenges for parents and clinicians. In such situations, clinicians must balance providing guidance with respecting parental autonomy. We explored parental perspectives on clinician guidance and effective communication during these decisions. Methods We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis within a randomized clinical trial using parental free-text responses to a simulated neonatal decision-making scenario. The study was carried out online between February and April 2024 in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria. Eligible participants were German-speaking parents of preterm infants with prior NICU experience, recruited through patient and parent organizations. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results Among 128 participants (84% female), parents emphasized the importance of clear, detailed, and evidence-based information about their child’s condition and treatment options, as well as empathetic, honest, and individualized communication. They valued sufficient time for discussion and reflection, access to second opinions, and attention to the child’s quality of life. Parents appeared to retain a sense of decision ownership, while differing in their preferences regarding clinician guidance. Some welcomed explicit recommendations, whereas others preferred neutral, value-sensitive communication that preserved space for independent deliberation. Conclusions Parents facing complex medical decisions value both high-quality information and empathetic and honest communication. While they generally retain decision ownership, preferences regarding clinician guidance vary, suggesting that clinicians should actively explore how much direction parents want and tailor their communication accordingly. Trial registration ISRCTN registry under number ISRCTN16123073, registration date: 17/01/2024, ( https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16123073 ).

BMC Pediatrics
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.