Pilot Evaluation of a Novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) Heart Rate Variability (HRV)-Guided Risk Stratification for Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis powered by artificial intelligence (AI) offers a rapid, non-invasive, and objective approach for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk stratification in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and impact of aiTriage™, an AI HRV-guided tool for chest pain triage, compared with standard care. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 560 ED patients with suspected ACS underwent 5- minute ECG monitoring for HRV analysis, which generated a 0-100 risk score and triage recommendations (high, medium, or low risk). Patients were randomized to standard care (control) or an HRV-guided protocol (intervention). Physicians in the control group were blinded to HRV results. Results: Of 426 analysed patients (mean age 54 ± 13 years, 35% female, 16.2% prior MI), the HRV-guided protocol reduced hospital admissions (50.2% vs 61.1%; risk difference -10.9 percentage points, 95% CI: -20.1 to -1.8) and serial cardiac enzyme testing (32.1% vs 41.7%; risk difference -9.6 percentage points, 95% CI: -18.4 to -0.9) compared with standard care. Among discharged patients, the median ED length of stay was 20 minutes shorter in the intervention group (95% CI: -45 minutes to 3 minutes). The overall 30-day MACE rate was 9.5%, with no events among discharged patients. Conclusion: A rapid AI HRV-guided risk stratification tool was feasible to deploy, and has potential to reduce serial cardiac enzyme testing, ED LOS and hospital admissions. An adequately powered RCT is needed to confirm these findings and assess clinical safety. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07074808).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.26.035
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilot Evaluation of a Novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) Heart Rate Variability (HRV)-Guided Risk Stratification for Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Swee Han Lim, Yogeswary Pasupathi, Kenneth Tan Boon Kiat, Pamela Isa Basilio-Razon et al.
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Pilot Evaluation of a Novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) Heart Rate Variability (HRV)-Guided Risk Stratification for Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Swee Han Lim, Yogeswary Pasupathi, Kenneth Tan Boon Kiat, Pamela Isa Basilio-Razon, Stephanie Fook-Chong, Helen Zhang, Yiteng Wang, Yiling Chan, Ruiqi Li, Priscilla Isabel Birthylon
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis powered by artificial intelligence (AI) offers a rapid, non-invasive, and objective approach for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk stratification in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and impact of aiTriage™, an AI HRV-guided tool for chest pain triage, compared with standard care. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized controlled trial, 560 ED patients with suspected ACS underwent 5- minute ECG monitoring for HRV analysis, which generated a 0-100 risk score and triage recommendations (high, medium, or low risk). Patients were randomized to standard care (control) or an HRV-guided protocol (intervention). Physicians in the control group were blinded to HRV results. Results: Of 426 analysed patients (mean age 54 ± 13 years, 35% female, 16.2% prior MI), the HRV-guided protocol reduced hospital admissions (50.2% vs 61.1%; risk difference -10.9 percentage points, 95% CI: -20.1 to -1.8) and serial cardiac enzyme testing (32.1% vs 41.7%; risk difference -9.6 percentage points, 95% CI: -18.4 to -0.9) compared with standard care. Among discharged patients, the median ED length of stay was 20 minutes shorter in the intervention group (95% CI: -45 minutes to 3 minutes). The overall 30-day MACE rate was 9.5%, with no events among discharged patients. Conclusion: A rapid AI HRV-guided risk stratification tool was feasible to deploy, and has potential to reduce serial cardiac enzyme testing, ED LOS and hospital admissions. An adequately powered RCT is needed to confirm these findings and assess clinical safety. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07074808).

Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Nanyang Technological University (SG), Singapore General Hospital (SG), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
National Health Insurance Service
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.