The Costs of Governing Truth: Fact-Checking, Perceived Censorship, and Political Participation Across Governance Contexts

This study examines how concerns about deepfakes, fact-checking, and perceived censorship on social media shape online political participation in AI-mediated information environments. Using survey data from Singapore, China, and the United States, we find that fact-checking behavior is positively associated with political participation across all contexts, whereas deepfake concerns have no direct effect. Importantly, perceived censorship conditions this relationship: under high perceived censorship, highly active fact-checkers who are concerned about deepfakes are more likely to disengage from political participation. The findings highlight perceived censorship as a tipping point at which participatory agency collapses into political withdrawal, even among motivated fact-checkers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2026.2706703
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Costs of Governing Truth: Fact-Checking, Perceived Censorship, and Political Participation Across Governance Contexts

Ruolan Deng, Saifuddin Ahmed, Muhammad Ehab Rasul
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

The Costs of Governing Truth: Fact-Checking, Perceived Censorship, and Political Participation Across Governance Contexts

Ruolan Deng, Saifuddin Ahmed, Muhammad Ehab Rasul
article en

Abstract

This study examines how concerns about deepfakes, fact-checking, and perceived censorship on social media shape online political participation in AI-mediated information environments. Using survey data from Singapore, China, and the United States, we find that fact-checking behavior is positively associated with political participation across all contexts, whereas deepfake concerns have no direct effect. Importantly, perceived censorship conditions this relationship: under high perceived censorship, highly active fact-checkers who are concerned about deepfakes are more likely to disengage from political participation. The findings highlight perceived censorship as a tipping point at which participatory agency collapses into political withdrawal, even among motivated fact-checkers.

Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Costs of Governing Truth: Fact-Checking, Perceived Censorship, and Political Participation Across Governance Contexts — Ruolan Deng, Saifuddin Ahmed, et al. · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS