Monitoring of breathing effort through pressure time product measurement using airway occlusion pressure (PTPPOCC study)

Monitoring respiratory effort is crucial to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction, but esophageal manometry (the gold standard) is invasive an can be cumbersome. The airway occlusion pressure (ΔP OCC ) correlates with inspiratory effort but does not account for inspiratory time (Ti) or respiratory rate (RR). We aimed to validate a novel non-invasive index (PTP POCC ) that combines ΔP OCC , Ti, and RR to estimate the esophageal pressure-time product (PTP ESO ). We conducted a prospective, multicenter, physiological, crossover study. Three levels of inspiratory pressure (5, 10, and 15 cm H₂O) were randomly applied in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in pressure support mode. We simultaneously measured PTP ESO and calculated the non-invasive PTP POCC (PTP POCC−min = (0.75 × ΔP OCC × Ti / 2) × RR). Association was assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting high (PTP ESO >150 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) and low (PTP ESO <50 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) inspiratory effort was evaluated using ROC curves. A total of 49 patients were analyzed. A significant positive association was found between PTP ESO−min and PTP POCC−min (regression coefficient: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86–1.1 p-value < 0.001). The mixed-effects model demonstrated good overall predictive performance (conditional R² = 0.80), although substantial inter-individual variability was observed (marginal R² = 0.40). The AUC for detecting high or low inspiratory effort was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.94), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88–0.94) respectively. Agreement analysis revealed proportional bias with wide limits of agreement. The PTP POCC index showed good performance for identifying extremes of respiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients. Despite limited individual agreement, its strong association and high specificity may make it a useful tool for confirming very low or excessively high inspiratory effort and for identifying patients at risk of over or under assistance. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT06040138 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06040138 ), first submitted date 2023-09-05.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04113-2
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring of breathing effort through pressure time product measurement using airway occlusion pressure (PTPPOCC study)

Matías Madorno, Emilio Steinberg, Norberto Tiribelli, Emiliano Gogniat et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Monitoring of breathing effort through pressure time product measurement using airway occlusion pressure (PTPPOCC study)

Matías Madorno, Emilio Steinberg, Norberto Tiribelli, Emiliano Gogniat, Jose Dianti, Sergio Giannasi, Pablo O. Rodriguez, Sebastián Fredes, Javier H. Dorado, Mariano Setten, Gustavo A. Plotnikow, Roque S. Moracci
article en

Abstract

Monitoring respiratory effort is crucial to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury and diaphragmatic dysfunction, but esophageal manometry (the gold standard) is invasive an can be cumbersome. The airway occlusion pressure (ΔP OCC ) correlates with inspiratory effort but does not account for inspiratory time (Ti) or respiratory rate (RR). We aimed to validate a novel non-invasive index (PTP POCC ) that combines ΔP OCC , Ti, and RR to estimate the esophageal pressure-time product (PTP ESO ). We conducted a prospective, multicenter, physiological, crossover study. Three levels of inspiratory pressure (5, 10, and 15 cm H₂O) were randomly applied in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in pressure support mode. We simultaneously measured PTP ESO and calculated the non-invasive PTP POCC (PTP POCC−min = (0.75 × ΔP OCC × Ti / 2) × RR). Association was assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting high (PTP ESO >150 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) and low (PTP ESO <50 cmH₂O·s·min⁻¹) inspiratory effort was evaluated using ROC curves. A total of 49 patients were analyzed. A significant positive association was found between PTP ESO−min and PTP POCC−min (regression coefficient: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86–1.1 p-value < 0.001). The mixed-effects model demonstrated good overall predictive performance (conditional R² = 0.80), although substantial inter-individual variability was observed (marginal R² = 0.40). The AUC for detecting high or low inspiratory effort was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87–0.94), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88–0.94) respectively. Agreement analysis revealed proportional bias with wide limits of agreement. The PTP POCC index showed good performance for identifying extremes of respiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients. Despite limited individual agreement, its strong association and high specificity may make it a useful tool for confirming very low or excessively high inspiratory effort and for identifying patients at risk of over or under assistance. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT06040138 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06040138 ), first submitted date 2023-09-05.

BMC Anesthesiology
Hospital Británico (UY), University of Toronto (CA), Universidad Abierta Interamericana (AR), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), MBMed (Argentina) (AR), Hospital Fernández (AR), Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín" (AR), Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni (AR), Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA) (AR), Sociedad Española de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (ES), Instituto de Gastroenterología (CU), Instituto Universitario de la Policía Federal Argentina (AR), Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR), Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires (AR), Sociedad Española de Cardiología (ES), Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.