Mothers who fight back: IPV and caregiving in families affected by parental incarceration

Research on prisoners’ families has documented the burdens placed on non-incarcerated caregivers, yet intimate partner violence (IPV) within these families remains underexplored. This paper examines how mothers in prisoners’ families negotiate caregiving responsibilities following IPV, and how these practices are shaped by structural inequalities and meaning-making. The findings show that IPV is not peripheral to caregiving, but a central organising force shaping fear, economic strain, maternal decision-making, and children’s relationships with imprisoned fathers. Mothers are engaged in intensive emotional, relational, and economic labour, including preserving paternal identities, managing disclosure, and navigating institutional constraints, often under conditions of violence and material hardship. Integrating perspectives on feminisation of poverty, gendered caregiving, mothering, and meaning-making, the paper highlights the gendered redistribution of punishment beyond the prison and argues for foregrounding IPV within criminological research on prisoners’ families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958261468764
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mothers who fight back: IPV and caregiving in families affected by parental incarceration

Eliska Suchomel Duskova
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Mothers who fight back: IPV and caregiving in families affected by parental incarceration

Eliska Suchomel Duskova
article en

Abstract

Research on prisoners’ families has documented the burdens placed on non-incarcerated caregivers, yet intimate partner violence (IPV) within these families remains underexplored. This paper examines how mothers in prisoners’ families negotiate caregiving responsibilities following IPV, and how these practices are shaped by structural inequalities and meaning-making. The findings show that IPV is not peripheral to caregiving, but a central organising force shaping fear, economic strain, maternal decision-making, and children’s relationships with imprisoned fathers. Mothers are engaged in intensive emotional, relational, and economic labour, including preserving paternal identities, managing disclosure, and navigating institutional constraints, often under conditions of violence and material hardship. Integrating perspectives on feminisation of poverty, gendered caregiving, mothering, and meaning-making, the paper highlights the gendered redistribution of punishment beyond the prison and argues for foregrounding IPV within criminological research on prisoners’ families.

Criminology & Criminal Justice
Charles University (CZ), University of Cambridge (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.