Beyond Biologics: Background Inhaled Therapy Shapes Remission in Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND: Clinical remission has emerged as an achievable therapeutic goal in severe asthma treated with biologics. However, the potential influence of background inhaled therapy on remission outcomes remains insufficiently explored. This study evaluated whether baseline inhaled therapy, particularly extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT), influences the achievement of complete clinical remission in patients with severe asthma initiating biologic treatment. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study including adult patients with severe asthma who initiated biological therapy according to Italian regulatory criteria (AIFA). Baseline (T0) corresponded to the start of biologic therapy without modification of inhaled treatment. Inhaled therapy was maintained unchanged during the 12-month follow-up. All patients underwent a clinical reassessment at 3 months to evaluate asthma control, adherence, and exacerbation occurrence. Complete remission at 12 months was defined according to Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) criteria: absence of exacerbations, well-controlled symptoms (ACT ≥20), no oral corticosteroid use, stable lung function, and no change in inhaled therapy. Clinical, functional, and inflammatory variables were compared between patients achieving complete remission and those who did not. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (median age 53 years, IQR 41-59; 55.2% male). At baseline, inhaled therapy consisted of high-dose ICS/LABA in 37.9%, open triple therapy in 27.6%, and extrafine SITT in 34.5% of patients. At the 3-month reassessment, no patient experienced exacerbations or worsening of asthma control, and inhaled therapy was not modified. After 12 months of biologic therapy, 14 patients (48.3%) achieved complete clinical remission. Remission rates differed significantly according to inhaled therapy regimen (p = 0.001). The highest remission proportion was observed in patients receiving extrafine SITT (64.3%), followed by open triple therapy (21.4%) and high-dose ICS/LABA (14.3%). Patients achieving remission were significantly more likely to be receiving extrafine SITT at baseline (64.3% vs 6.7%), whereas high-dose ICS/LABA predominated among non-remission patients (60.0% vs 14.3%). No significant differences were observed between groups in demographic characteristics, asthma duration, lung function, inflammatory biomarkers (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE), comorbidities, or type of biologic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe asthma initiating biologic therapy, baseline inhaled therapy-particularly extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy- was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving complete clinical remission. The higher remission rate observed with extrafine SITT compared with open triple therapy or ICS/LABA is consistent with a potential synergistic interaction between optimized inhaled therapy targeting small airway dysfunction and biologic therapy targeting type-2 inflammation. These findings support the importance of maintaining optimized background inhaled therapy within a remission-driven treatment strategy. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asthma
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2026.2706355
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Biologics: Background Inhaled Therapy Shapes Remission in Severe Asthma

Marta Tornesello, Andrea Portacci, Leonardo Maselli, Alessio Marinelli et al.
Journal of Asthma
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Beyond Biologics: Background Inhaled Therapy Shapes Remission in Severe Asthma

Marta Tornesello, Andrea Portacci, Leonardo Maselli, Alessio Marinelli, Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta, Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano, Silvano Dragonieri, Giulia Amoroso, Maria Granito, Santina Ferrulli, Gennaro Rociola
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical remission has emerged as an achievable therapeutic goal in severe asthma treated with biologics. However, the potential influence of background inhaled therapy on remission outcomes remains insufficiently explored. This study evaluated whether baseline inhaled therapy, particularly extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT), influences the achievement of complete clinical remission in patients with severe asthma initiating biologic treatment. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study including adult patients with severe asthma who initiated biological therapy according to Italian regulatory criteria (AIFA). Baseline (T0) corresponded to the start of biologic therapy without modification of inhaled treatment. Inhaled therapy was maintained unchanged during the 12-month follow-up. All patients underwent a clinical reassessment at 3 months to evaluate asthma control, adherence, and exacerbation occurrence. Complete remission at 12 months was defined according to Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) criteria: absence of exacerbations, well-controlled symptoms (ACT ≥20), no oral corticosteroid use, stable lung function, and no change in inhaled therapy. Clinical, functional, and inflammatory variables were compared between patients achieving complete remission and those who did not. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (median age 53 years, IQR 41-59; 55.2% male). At baseline, inhaled therapy consisted of high-dose ICS/LABA in 37.9%, open triple therapy in 27.6%, and extrafine SITT in 34.5% of patients. At the 3-month reassessment, no patient experienced exacerbations or worsening of asthma control, and inhaled therapy was not modified. After 12 months of biologic therapy, 14 patients (48.3%) achieved complete clinical remission. Remission rates differed significantly according to inhaled therapy regimen (p = 0.001). The highest remission proportion was observed in patients receiving extrafine SITT (64.3%), followed by open triple therapy (21.4%) and high-dose ICS/LABA (14.3%). Patients achieving remission were significantly more likely to be receiving extrafine SITT at baseline (64.3% vs 6.7%), whereas high-dose ICS/LABA predominated among non-remission patients (60.0% vs 14.3%). No significant differences were observed between groups in demographic characteristics, asthma duration, lung function, inflammatory biomarkers (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE), comorbidities, or type of biologic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe asthma initiating biologic therapy, baseline inhaled therapy-particularly extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy- was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving complete clinical remission. The higher remission rate observed with extrafine SITT compared with open triple therapy or ICS/LABA is consistent with a potential synergistic interaction between optimized inhaled therapy targeting small airway dysfunction and biologic therapy targeting type-2 inflammation. These findings support the importance of maintaining optimized background inhaled therapy within a remission-driven treatment strategy. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Journal of Asthma
University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.