Faculty views on gender integration in LIS education: A multi-country survey

Integrating gender perspectives into higher education curricula is widely recognized as essential for inclusive and socially responsive teaching, yet implementation remains uneven across disciplines and institutional contexts. This study examines how gender perspectives are incorporated into Library and Information Science (LIS) teaching across six European countries. A cross-sectional survey of 115 academic staff collected sociodemographic and professional information, perceptions of institutional support and barriers, and qualitative reflections. Quantitative analysis identified a three-factor institutional support model—formal commitment, policy implementation and expertise, and student and faculty engagement—with no significant differences by gender or country. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed four themes: the educational value of gender perspectives, curricular integration, institutional enablers (training, resources, workload recognition), and resistance or controversy. Findings suggest that formal commitments alone are insufficient and must be supported by concrete institutional mechanisms. The study provides comparative evidence and practical recommendations for embedding gender perspectives sustainably in LIS curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Library & Information Science Research
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101423
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty views on gender integration in LIS education: A multi-country survey

Michaela Dombrovská, Anna Villarroya, Eithne Knappitsch, Juan-José Bóte-Vericad et al.
Library & Information Science Research
Gender Studies in Language
article

Faculty views on gender integration in LIS education: A multi-country survey

Michaela Dombrovská, Anna Villarroya, Eithne Knappitsch, Juan-José Bóte-Vericad, Alica Kolarić, Boris Badurina, Thomas Mandl, Lejla Hajdarpašić
article en

Abstract

Integrating gender perspectives into higher education curricula is widely recognized as essential for inclusive and socially responsive teaching, yet implementation remains uneven across disciplines and institutional contexts. This study examines how gender perspectives are incorporated into Library and Information Science (LIS) teaching across six European countries. A cross-sectional survey of 115 academic staff collected sociodemographic and professional information, perceptions of institutional support and barriers, and qualitative reflections. Quantitative analysis identified a three-factor institutional support model—formal commitment, policy implementation and expertise, and student and faculty engagement—with no significant differences by gender or country. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed four themes: the educational value of gender perspectives, curricular integration, institutional enablers (training, resources, workload recognition), and resistance or controversy. Findings suggest that formal commitments alone are insufficient and must be supported by concrete institutional mechanisms. The study provides comparative evidence and practical recommendations for embedding gender perspectives sustainably in LIS curricula.

Library & Information Science ResearchVol. 48(4)
University of Sarajevo (BA), University of Hildesheim (DE), International University of Sarajevo (BA), Masaryk University (CZ), Silesian University in Opava (CZ), FH Kärnten (AT), Port d'Informació Científica (ES), University of Osijek (HR), University of Zadar (HR)
Universitat de Barcelona
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.