Salvage Treatment Strategies for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence after Breast-Conserving Therapy: a Real-World Study

BACKGROUND: Salvage mastectomy has long been regarded as the standard treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) combined with radiotherapy. However, the feasibility and oncological outcomes of alternative local treatment strategies-such as repeat breast-conserving surgery (R-BCS) with or without re-irradiation, or mastectomy combined with re-irradiation-remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we retrospectively analyzed female patients who developed IBTR after initial BCS combined with radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), cumulative incidence of second IBTR, and cumulative incidence of contralateral breast cancer were compared between patients treated with salvage mastectomy and those receiving alternative local treatment strategies. RESULTS: A total of 4,651 patients were included. After propensity score matching (PSM), all three groups-R-BCS alone, R-BCS with re-irradiation, and mastectomy with re-irradiation-showed comparable OS, BCSS and contralateral breast cancer risk when compared with salvage mastectomy as the reference. Compared with mastectomy, the cumulative incidence of 10-year second IBTR was significantly higher in the R-BCS-alone group (0.36% vs 5.04%, P = 0.002), while no significant differences were observed for R-BCS combined with re-irradiation or mastectomy combined with re-irradiation (P > 0.999 and P = 0.305, respectively). Subgroup analyses suggested that re-irradiation might correlate with inferior survival in triple-negative IBTR. CONCLUSION: For patients experiencing recurrence after breast-conserving therapy, R-BCS combined with re-irradiation represents a viable alternative to salvage mastectomy. R-BCS alone may increase the risk of second IBTR, while the addition of re-irradiation to mastectomy did not provide additional benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag274
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Salvage Treatment Strategies for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence after Breast-Conserving Therapy: a Real-World Study

Jichun Zhou, Shenkangle Wang, Qingliang Wu, Zijie Guo et al.
The Oncologist
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Salvage Treatment Strategies for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence after Breast-Conserving Therapy: a Real-World Study

Jichun Zhou, Shenkangle Wang, Qingliang Wu, Zijie Guo, Xixi Lin, Binbin Cui, Ziyu Zhu, Xiaonan Sun, Xianjun Xu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salvage mastectomy has long been regarded as the standard treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) combined with radiotherapy. However, the feasibility and oncological outcomes of alternative local treatment strategies-such as repeat breast-conserving surgery (R-BCS) with or without re-irradiation, or mastectomy combined with re-irradiation-remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we retrospectively analyzed female patients who developed IBTR after initial BCS combined with radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), cumulative incidence of second IBTR, and cumulative incidence of contralateral breast cancer were compared between patients treated with salvage mastectomy and those receiving alternative local treatment strategies. RESULTS: A total of 4,651 patients were included. After propensity score matching (PSM), all three groups-R-BCS alone, R-BCS with re-irradiation, and mastectomy with re-irradiation-showed comparable OS, BCSS and contralateral breast cancer risk when compared with salvage mastectomy as the reference. Compared with mastectomy, the cumulative incidence of 10-year second IBTR was significantly higher in the R-BCS-alone group (0.36% vs 5.04%, P = 0.002), while no significant differences were observed for R-BCS combined with re-irradiation or mastectomy combined with re-irradiation (P > 0.999 and P = 0.305, respectively). Subgroup analyses suggested that re-irradiation might correlate with inferior survival in triple-negative IBTR. CONCLUSION: For patients experiencing recurrence after breast-conserving therapy, R-BCS combined with re-irradiation represents a viable alternative to salvage mastectomy. R-BCS alone may increase the risk of second IBTR, while the addition of re-irradiation to mastectomy did not provide additional benefit.

The Oncologist
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN), 117th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (CN), Zoucheng People's Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Xixi hospital (CN), Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.