Long-Term Outcomes of PRESBYOND Laser Correction for Presbyopia: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of Presbyond Laser Blended Vision (LBV) in a cohort of presbyopic patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients (200 eyes) aged 40–69 years (mean 49.58 ± 5.76 years) who underwent Presbyond LBV between 2020 and 2024. Patients were classified as myopic (n = 53), hyperopic (n = 42), emmetropic (n = 3), or anisometropic (n = 2). All patients completed a minimum follow-up of 15 months (range, 15–59 months). Outcomes included binocular distance and near visual acuity, refractive stability, enhancement rates, patient satisfaction, visual discomfort, and spectacle independence. Owing to the very small number of emmetropic and anisometropic patients, these subgroups were evaluated descriptively only. Results: Between 1 month and the final follow-up (≥15 months), mean changes in spherical equivalent were small in both dominant and nondominant eyes in the myopic (−0.16 ± 0.41 D and −0.19 ± 0.60 D, respectively) and hyperopic (+0.21 ± 0.69 D and +0.18 ± 0.85 D, respectively) groups, indicating stable long-term refractive outcomes. At the final follow-up, binocular UDVA of ≤0.08 logMAR was achieved by 88.7% of myopic and 85.7% of hyperopic patients, while binocular UNVA of ≤0.30 logMAR was achieved in 99% of the overall cohort. Loss of 1–2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity occurred in 20% of patients, whereas 39.6% of myopic patients gained at least one CDVA line. Loss of near visual acuity was observed in only one hyperopic patient. Overall, 72% of patients reported satisfaction and most remained spectacle-independent. However, enhancement was required in 21% of patients, particularly among hyperopic individuals. Conclusions: Presbyond LBV provides durable long-term visual and refractive outcomes, excellent binocular distance and near visual acuity, and a high degree of spectacle independence in appropriately selected presbyopic patients. However, outcomes differed according to baseline refractive status. Hyperopic patients demonstrated higher enhancement rates, more frequent postoperative visual symptoms and lower subjective satisfaction despite generally favorable objective visual outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of careful patient selection, thorough preoperative counselling and realistic expectation management, particularly in hyperopic patients. This study represents the longest-term evaluation of Presbyond LBV reported to date.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15155850
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-Term Outcomes of PRESBYOND Laser Correction for Presbyopia: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis

Justyna Izdebska, Joanna Przybek-Skrzypecka, Ewelina Trojacka, Janusz Skrzypecki et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Long-Term Outcomes of PRESBYOND Laser Correction for Presbyopia: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis

Justyna Izdebska, Joanna Przybek-Skrzypecka, Ewelina Trojacka, Janusz Skrzypecki, Jacek P. Szaflik
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of Presbyond Laser Blended Vision (LBV) in a cohort of presbyopic patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients (200 eyes) aged 40–69 years (mean 49.58 ± 5.76 years) who underwent Presbyond LBV between 2020 and 2024. Patients were classified as myopic (n = 53), hyperopic (n = 42), emmetropic (n = 3), or anisometropic (n = 2). All patients completed a minimum follow-up of 15 months (range, 15–59 months). Outcomes included binocular distance and near visual acuity, refractive stability, enhancement rates, patient satisfaction, visual discomfort, and spectacle independence. Owing to the very small number of emmetropic and anisometropic patients, these subgroups were evaluated descriptively only. Results: Between 1 month and the final follow-up (≥15 months), mean changes in spherical equivalent were small in both dominant and nondominant eyes in the myopic (−0.16 ± 0.41 D and −0.19 ± 0.60 D, respectively) and hyperopic (+0.21 ± 0.69 D and +0.18 ± 0.85 D, respectively) groups, indicating stable long-term refractive outcomes. At the final follow-up, binocular UDVA of ≤0.08 logMAR was achieved by 88.7% of myopic and 85.7% of hyperopic patients, while binocular UNVA of ≤0.30 logMAR was achieved in 99% of the overall cohort. Loss of 1–2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity occurred in 20% of patients, whereas 39.6% of myopic patients gained at least one CDVA line. Loss of near visual acuity was observed in only one hyperopic patient. Overall, 72% of patients reported satisfaction and most remained spectacle-independent. However, enhancement was required in 21% of patients, particularly among hyperopic individuals. Conclusions: Presbyond LBV provides durable long-term visual and refractive outcomes, excellent binocular distance and near visual acuity, and a high degree of spectacle independence in appropriately selected presbyopic patients. However, outcomes differed according to baseline refractive status. Hyperopic patients demonstrated higher enhancement rates, more frequent postoperative visual symptoms and lower subjective satisfaction despite generally favorable objective visual outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of careful patient selection, thorough preoperative counselling and realistic expectation management, particularly in hyperopic patients. This study represents the longest-term evaluation of Presbyond LBV reported to date.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(15)
Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Międzyleski Szpital Specjalistyczny w Warszawie (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.