Project-based learning and task-based language teaching: continuities, differences and the potential for integration

Abstract This article offers a historically-informed, critical comparison of project-based learning (PBL) and task-based language teaching (TBLT) in language education. It discusses their distinctive origins, theories of learning and composite features to identify elements of a shared underlying ethos and a number of important continuities. It also highlights important differences, particularly in the areas of cross-curricular learning, transferrable skills, opportunities for creativity and process versus product orientations, all of which have implications for their feasibility and impact in different educational contexts. The article also explores the potential integration of the two approaches. As well as proposing an original task-integrated project framework for occasions when integration is possible, it cautions that there are, nonetheless, a number of project and task types that do not lend themselves well to integration. It identifies an almost complete absence of comparative research on the two approaches, despite their widespread use and offers a number of suggestions and critical cautions for potential research in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Linguistics
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2026-0004
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Project-based learning and task-based language teaching: continuities, differences and the potential for integration

Jason Anderson
Educational Linguistics
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Project-based learning and task-based language teaching: continuities, differences and the potential for integration

Jason Anderson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article offers a historically-informed, critical comparison of project-based learning (PBL) and task-based language teaching (TBLT) in language education. It discusses their distinctive origins, theories of learning and composite features to identify elements of a shared underlying ethos and a number of important continuities. It also highlights important differences, particularly in the areas of cross-curricular learning, transferrable skills, opportunities for creativity and process versus product orientations, all of which have implications for their feasibility and impact in different educational contexts. The article also explores the potential integration of the two approaches. As well as proposing an original task-integrated project framework for occasions when integration is possible, it cautions that there are, nonetheless, a number of project and task types that do not lend themselves well to integration. It identifies an almost complete absence of comparative research on the two approaches, despite their widespread use and offers a number of suggestions and critical cautions for potential research in the future.

Educational Linguistics
University of Warwick (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Project-based learning and task-based language teaching: continuities, differences and the potential for integration — Jason Anderson · Educational Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS