Putting Mouths Where the Money Is: An Analysis of Input to the Swedish Research Bill of 2024

Abstract Higher education institutions have come to play an increasingly important role for a variety of different political purposes ranging from regional growth to science diplomacy. As this importance has increased, issues of control over higher education institutions have become increasingly contested. Based on a conceptual framework drawing on theory concerning academic freedom and principal-agent relationships, this study examines expressions of the contested control in higher education discourse. With an empirical material of 77 opinion papers requested by and sent to the Swedish government in preparation for its research and innovation bill of 2024, the study consists of a thematic analysis of adopted positions, and concludes that seemingly shared support for academic freedom and research excellence hide underlying conflicts regarding conceptions of freedom and control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Policy
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-026-00464-0
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting Mouths Where the Money Is: An Analysis of Input to the Swedish Research Bill of 2024

Stefan Lundborg
Higher Education Policy
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

Putting Mouths Where the Money Is: An Analysis of Input to the Swedish Research Bill of 2024

Stefan Lundborg
article en

Abstract

Abstract Higher education institutions have come to play an increasingly important role for a variety of different political purposes ranging from regional growth to science diplomacy. As this importance has increased, issues of control over higher education institutions have become increasingly contested. Based on a conceptual framework drawing on theory concerning academic freedom and principal-agent relationships, this study examines expressions of the contested control in higher education discourse. With an empirical material of 77 opinion papers requested by and sent to the Swedish government in preparation for its research and innovation bill of 2024, the study consists of a thematic analysis of adopted positions, and concludes that seemingly shared support for academic freedom and research excellence hide underlying conflicts regarding conceptions of freedom and control.

Higher Education Policy
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.