Can Generative <scp>AI</scp> Empower Tibetan Students in English Writing? Exploring Performance Gains, Self‐Efficacy Enhancement and Cultural Expression

ABSTRACT Background Tibetan university students often write in English within a complex multilingual environment involving Tibetan, Chinese and English. Previous studies have suggested that multilingual learners may experience challenges related to cross‐linguistic transfer, as well as difficulties in expressing culturally specific concepts in English writing. At the same time, limited research has examined how contextually relevant AI‐supported feedback is experienced in minority‐language educational contexts. Objective This study explored associations between participation in a contextually relevant GenAI‐supported writing intervention (implemented through the Doubao app) and Tibetan college students' English writing performance, self‐efficacy (SE) and experiences of cultural expression in English writing. Methods A 16‐week quasi‐experiment was conducted with 60 Tibetan students paired into an experimental group (EG, n = 30, using AI with cultural support) and a control group (CG, n = 30, traditional teaching). Data were collected through writing tests, an SE scale and semi‐structured interviews. Results The EG demonstrated higher scores than the CG on several writing measures, particularly Vocabulary and Language Use, and these differences remained evident in the delayed post‐test. Positive patterns were also observed across writing SE measures. Interview data suggested that some participants perceived cultural terminology support and contrastive linguistic feedback as helpful during writing and revision activities. Conclusion The findings suggest that participation in a contextually relevant AI‐supported writing intervention was associated with positive writing outcomes among Tibetan trilingual learners. Participants perceived feedback addressing Tibetan–English structural differences and culturally specific terminology as helpful during writing tasks. Further research is needed to better understand the specific contribution of these context‐sensitive features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70298
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Generative AI Empower Tibetan Students in English Writing? Exploring Performance Gains, Self‐Efficacy Enhancement and Cultural Expression

Ming Cheng
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Can Generative AI Empower Tibetan Students in English Writing? Exploring Performance Gains, Self‐Efficacy Enhancement and Cultural Expression

Ming Cheng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Tibetan university students often write in English within a complex multilingual environment involving Tibetan, Chinese and English. Previous studies have suggested that multilingual learners may experience challenges related to cross‐linguistic transfer, as well as difficulties in expressing culturally specific concepts in English writing. At the same time, limited research has examined how contextually relevant AI‐supported feedback is experienced in minority‐language educational contexts. Objective This study explored associations between participation in a contextually relevant GenAI‐supported writing intervention (implemented through the Doubao app) and Tibetan college students' English writing performance, self‐efficacy (SE) and experiences of cultural expression in English writing. Methods A 16‐week quasi‐experiment was conducted with 60 Tibetan students paired into an experimental group (EG, n = 30, using AI with cultural support) and a control group (CG, n = 30, traditional teaching). Data were collected through writing tests, an SE scale and semi‐structured interviews. Results The EG demonstrated higher scores than the CG on several writing measures, particularly Vocabulary and Language Use, and these differences remained evident in the delayed post‐test. Positive patterns were also observed across writing SE measures. Interview data suggested that some participants perceived cultural terminology support and contrastive linguistic feedback as helpful during writing and revision activities. Conclusion The findings suggest that participation in a contextually relevant AI‐supported writing intervention was associated with positive writing outcomes among Tibetan trilingual learners. Participants perceived feedback addressing Tibetan–English structural differences and culturally specific terminology as helpful during writing tasks. Further research is needed to better understand the specific contribution of these context‐sensitive features.

Journal of Computer Assisted LearningVol. 42(5)
BaiCheng Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.