An Unfunded Mandate? Medicaid Continuous Coverage Requirements and State Fiscal Burdens During COVID‐19

ABSTRACT At the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the federal government increased states' Medicaid Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) by 6.2 percentage points, contingent on a continuous coverage requirement that prevented disenrollment. While these policies were expected to generate offsetting fiscal effects, their realized impacts have not been quantified. We estimate that states' share of continuous coverage costs totaled $139.2 billion nationwide, about $11.0 billion less than the additional revenues through higher FMAPs, implying the policy was fully federally funded nationally. However, fiscal effects varied substantially across states, with twenty states receiving insufficient federal aid to offset their excess coverage costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Budgeting &amp Finance
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.70041
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Unfunded Mandate? Medicaid Continuous Coverage Requirements and State Fiscal Burdens During COVID‐19

Anwita Mahajan, Jeffrey Clemens
Public Budgeting &amp Finance
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

An Unfunded Mandate? Medicaid Continuous Coverage Requirements and State Fiscal Burdens During COVID‐19

Anwita Mahajan, Jeffrey Clemens
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT At the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the federal government increased states' Medicaid Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAPs) by 6.2 percentage points, contingent on a continuous coverage requirement that prevented disenrollment. While these policies were expected to generate offsetting fiscal effects, their realized impacts have not been quantified. We estimate that states' share of continuous coverage costs totaled $139.2 billion nationwide, about $11.0 billion less than the additional revenues through higher FMAPs, implying the policy was fully federally funded nationally. However, fiscal effects varied substantially across states, with twenty states receiving insufficient federal aid to offset their excess coverage costs.

Public Budgeting &amp Finance
University of San Diego (US), University of California System (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Smith Richardson Foundation, Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.