Governance of generative <scp>AI</scp> in higher education: A qualitative analysis of universities' policies and global insights

Abstract As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into higher education, institutions face challenges in balancing its benefits with potential risks, including plagiarism, misinformation, bias and privacy concerns. This study examines the policies and guidelines on generative AI usage implemented by leading US universities ranking based best colleges in the world in the US News List using a qualitative document analysis approach. The study identifies key themes in generative AI governance, including responsible experimentation, transparency, AI literacy and faculty discretion in policy implementation. While universities recognise the potential of AI to enhance learning and research, policies vary significantly across regions, with European institutions adhering to stricter regulations and US universities granting faculty greater flexibility. The results also provide valuable insights for policymakers and educators seeking to develop responsible AI governance frameworks in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70256
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance of generative AI in higher education: A qualitative analysis of universities' policies and global insights

Lina Bashatah, Safana Aseri, Abdulaziz A. Alfayez, Abdullah E. Alotaibi et al.
British Educational Research Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Governance of generative AI in higher education: A qualitative analysis of universities' policies and global insights

Lina Bashatah, Safana Aseri, Abdulaziz A. Alfayez, Abdullah E. Alotaibi, Ahmad Aseery
article en

Abstract

Abstract As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into higher education, institutions face challenges in balancing its benefits with potential risks, including plagiarism, misinformation, bias and privacy concerns. This study examines the policies and guidelines on generative AI usage implemented by leading US universities ranking based best colleges in the world in the US News List using a qualitative document analysis approach. The study identifies key themes in generative AI governance, including responsible experimentation, transparency, AI literacy and faculty discretion in policy implementation. While universities recognise the potential of AI to enhance learning and research, policies vary significantly across regions, with European institutions adhering to stricter regulations and US universities granting faculty greater flexibility. The results also provide valuable insights for policymakers and educators seeking to develop responsible AI governance frameworks in higher education.

British Educational Research Journal
King Saud University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Governance of generative <scp>AI</scp> in higher education: A qualitative analysis of universities' policies and global insights — Lina Bashatah, Safana Aseri, et al. · British Educational Research Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS