Relationships Between Trust, Compliance, and Performance for Novice Programmers Using AI Code Generation

ObjectiveTo explore how novice programmers' trust in Artificial Intelligence-driven Development Environments (AIDEs) relates to their coding performance and AI compliance while programming under time pressure.BackgroundComputer programming has undergone rapid upheaval due to state-of-the-art AIDEs, which provide clever automation for many aspects of software development. A longstanding interest of researchers of automation more generally has been the attitude of trust. Decades of research seek to explain how influencing trust can help to achieve desirable outcomes in different domains, but very limited work has provided similar focus on trust in AIDEs.MethodWe collected subjective measures of trust along with objective measures of performance and AIDE compliance from a diverse group of 27 novice programmers between two study locations.ResultsOur results corroborated traditional understandings of how trust changes through experiences. However, we did not find a relationship between trust and subsequent compliance during programming tasks. Greater compliance was associated with strong performance, and strong performance led to greater subsequent trust.ConclusionOur findings raise new questions about the utility of trust in the context of interacting with AIDEs and generative AI. We call for further research into the effect of trust on compliance to recommendations from imperfect AI.ApplicationThis work can inform the design of training and educational content for generative AI use within and beyond software development. Instructional designers should consider risks of AI misuse and disuse and focus on promoting desirable interaction outcomes, regardless of trust's connection to them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261467254
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships Between Trust, Compliance, and Performance for Novice Programmers Using AI Code Generation

Matthew L. Bolton, Sara L. Riggs, Nicholas Gardella
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Relationships Between Trust, Compliance, and Performance for Novice Programmers Using AI Code Generation

Matthew L. Bolton, Sara L. Riggs, Nicholas Gardella
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore how novice programmers' trust in Artificial Intelligence-driven Development Environments (AIDEs) relates to their coding performance and AI compliance while programming under time pressure.BackgroundComputer programming has undergone rapid upheaval due to state-of-the-art AIDEs, which provide clever automation for many aspects of software development. A longstanding interest of researchers of automation more generally has been the attitude of trust. Decades of research seek to explain how influencing trust can help to achieve desirable outcomes in different domains, but very limited work has provided similar focus on trust in AIDEs.MethodWe collected subjective measures of trust along with objective measures of performance and AIDE compliance from a diverse group of 27 novice programmers between two study locations.ResultsOur results corroborated traditional understandings of how trust changes through experiences. However, we did not find a relationship between trust and subsequent compliance during programming tasks. Greater compliance was associated with strong performance, and strong performance led to greater subsequent trust.ConclusionOur findings raise new questions about the utility of trust in the context of interacting with AIDEs and generative AI. We call for further research into the effect of trust on compliance to recommendations from imperfect AI.ApplicationThis work can inform the design of training and educational content for generative AI use within and beyond software development. Instructional designers should consider risks of AI misuse and disuse and focus on promoting desirable interaction outcomes, regardless of trust's connection to them.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Washington and Lee University (US), University of Virginia (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relationships Between Trust, Compliance, and Performance for Novice Programmers Using AI Code Generation — Matthew L. Bolton, Sara L. Riggs, et al. · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS