COUNTERTERRORISM OR STATE TERRORISM? A HUMAN SECURITY ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE NIGERIAN ARMED FORCES IN NORTHEAST NIGERIA

This study critically examines the relationship between counterterrorism operations and human rights protection in Nigeria, with a particular focus on the activities of the NAF in combating Boko Haram and other violent extremist groups in Northeast Nigeria. While counterterrorism initiatives have contributed to weakening insurgent networks, reclaiming occupied territories, and restoring aspects of state authority, concerns persist regarding the human rights implications of military operations. Drawing on the theories of human security and critical terrorism, the study investigates whether Nigeria’s counterterrorism strategy has enhanced civilian security or, alternatively, generated new forms of insecurity through alleged violations of fundamental rights. Using a qualitative, historical analytical approach premised on relevant secondary sources, the study evaluates human rights records under the administrations of Obasanjo, Jonathan, Buhari, and Tinubu. Although successive governments have justified military operations as necessary responses to terrorism and insecurity, allegations of extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, prolonged detention, torture, enforced disappearances, excessive use of force, and weak accountability mechanisms have remained recurring features of Nigeria’s security landscape. The study argues that counterterrorism effectiveness should not be assessed solely through military achievements but also through its capacity to protect human dignity, uphold the rule of law, and strengthen public trust in state institutions. It concludes that sustainable peace and security require a human-centered approach that combines effective security measures with accountability, democratic governance, socioeconomic development, and respect for human rights. This study contributes to the ongoing debates on state violence, human security, and the legitimacy of counterterrorism practices in democratic societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21628006
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COUNTERTERRORISM OR STATE TERRORISM? A HUMAN SECURITY ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE NIGERIAN ARMED FORCES IN NORTHEAST NIGERIA

Opeoluwa Adisa Oluyemi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

COUNTERTERRORISM OR STATE TERRORISM? A HUMAN SECURITY ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE NIGERIAN ARMED FORCES IN NORTHEAST NIGERIA

Opeoluwa Adisa Oluyemi
article en

Abstract

This study critically examines the relationship between counterterrorism operations and human rights protection in Nigeria, with a particular focus on the activities of the NAF in combating Boko Haram and other violent extremist groups in Northeast Nigeria. While counterterrorism initiatives have contributed to weakening insurgent networks, reclaiming occupied territories, and restoring aspects of state authority, concerns persist regarding the human rights implications of military operations. Drawing on the theories of human security and critical terrorism, the study investigates whether Nigeria’s counterterrorism strategy has enhanced civilian security or, alternatively, generated new forms of insecurity through alleged violations of fundamental rights. Using a qualitative, historical analytical approach premised on relevant secondary sources, the study evaluates human rights records under the administrations of Obasanjo, Jonathan, Buhari, and Tinubu. Although successive governments have justified military operations as necessary responses to terrorism and insecurity, allegations of extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, prolonged detention, torture, enforced disappearances, excessive use of force, and weak accountability mechanisms have remained recurring features of Nigeria’s security landscape. The study argues that counterterrorism effectiveness should not be assessed solely through military achievements but also through its capacity to protect human dignity, uphold the rule of law, and strengthen public trust in state institutions. It concludes that sustainable peace and security require a human-centered approach that combines effective security measures with accountability, democratic governance, socioeconomic development, and respect for human rights. This study contributes to the ongoing debates on state violence, human security, and the legitimacy of counterterrorism practices in democratic societies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Achievers University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COUNTERTERRORISM OR STATE TERRORISM? A HUMAN SECURITY ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE NIGERIAN ARMED FORCES IN NORTHEAST NIGERIA — Opeoluwa Adisa Oluyemi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS