Repair Bond Strength of Self‐Cure Bulk‐Fill Composites: Influence of Substrate Composition, Surface Conditioning, and Repair Material Type

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of substrate composition, surface conditioning protocol, and repair material type on the repair shear bond strength (SBS) of an aged self-cure bulk-fill resin composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 specimens were fabricated using two substrate compositions of a self-cure bulk-fill composite (Stela; Automix and Capsule). After initial aging by thermocycling, specimens were repaired according to a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design based on surface conditioning (mechanical roughening with or without 37% phosphoric acid etching) and repair material type (self-cure composite with proprietary primer or light-cure nanohybrid composite with a universal adhesive). SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD, and Fisher's exact tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Substrate composition, surface conditioning protocol, and repair material type each significantly affected repair bond strength (p < 0.001). Capsule-based substrates showed higher SBS values than Automix substrates. Phosphoric acid etching significantly increased SBS compared with mechanical roughening alone. Repairs performed with the same self-cure composite exhibited significantly higher SBS than those repaired with a light-cure composite. Significant two-way interactions were observed between substrate composition × repair material type (p < 0.001) and surface conditioning × repair material type (p = 0.015). The highest SBS was observed in the Capsule + acid etching + self-cure repair group. Failure mode analysis revealed predominantly cohesive or mixed failures in self-cure repair groups, whereas light-cure repair groups showed a higher frequency of adhesive failures. CONCLUSION: Repair bond strength of a self-cure bulk-fill composite is highly material- and protocol-dependent. Utilizing a chemically compatible self-cure material system combined with adjunctive phosphoric acid etching significantly optimizes repair longevity, especially when applied to mechanically triturated capsule-based substrates. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The selection of repair material and surface conditioning protocol significantly influences the repair bond strength of aged self-cure bulk-fill composites. When the original restorative material is known, repair with the same composite system following phosphoric acid conditioning may provide more durable bonding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70243
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repair Bond Strength of Self‐Cure Bulk‐Fill Composites: Influence of Substrate Composition, Surface Conditioning, and Repair Material Type

Sema Yazıcı Akbıyık, Simge Canatan, Sıla Nur Usta, Sedanur SAKALLI et al.
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Repair Bond Strength of Self‐Cure Bulk‐Fill Composites: Influence of Substrate Composition, Surface Conditioning, and Repair Material Type

Sema Yazıcı Akbıyık, Simge Canatan, Sıla Nur Usta, Sedanur SAKALLI, Esra Yildirim Manav
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of substrate composition, surface conditioning protocol, and repair material type on the repair shear bond strength (SBS) of an aged self-cure bulk-fill resin composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 specimens were fabricated using two substrate compositions of a self-cure bulk-fill composite (Stela; Automix and Capsule). After initial aging by thermocycling, specimens were repaired according to a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design based on surface conditioning (mechanical roughening with or without 37% phosphoric acid etching) and repair material type (self-cure composite with proprietary primer or light-cure nanohybrid composite with a universal adhesive). SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were analyzed using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD, and Fisher's exact tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Substrate composition, surface conditioning protocol, and repair material type each significantly affected repair bond strength (p < 0.001). Capsule-based substrates showed higher SBS values than Automix substrates. Phosphoric acid etching significantly increased SBS compared with mechanical roughening alone. Repairs performed with the same self-cure composite exhibited significantly higher SBS than those repaired with a light-cure composite. Significant two-way interactions were observed between substrate composition × repair material type (p < 0.001) and surface conditioning × repair material type (p = 0.015). The highest SBS was observed in the Capsule + acid etching + self-cure repair group. Failure mode analysis revealed predominantly cohesive or mixed failures in self-cure repair groups, whereas light-cure repair groups showed a higher frequency of adhesive failures. CONCLUSION: Repair bond strength of a self-cure bulk-fill composite is highly material- and protocol-dependent. Utilizing a chemically compatible self-cure material system combined with adjunctive phosphoric acid etching significantly optimizes repair longevity, especially when applied to mechanically triturated capsule-based substrates. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The selection of repair material and surface conditioning protocol significantly influences the repair bond strength of aged self-cure bulk-fill composites. When the original restorative material is known, repair with the same composite system following phosphoric acid conditioning may provide more durable bonding.

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Ankara University (TR), Psychiatric Association of Turkey (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.