Recycling Lithium-Ion Batteries: Comparison of Two Sulfation Roasting Routes for Efficient Lithium-First Recycling from LFP and NCM Black Mass

The rapid increase in electric vehicles has increased the generation of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the need for efficient lithium recovery technologies. This study compared two distinct sulfation roasting routes, using sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) at 750 °C and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) at 550 °C, applied to black mass derived from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NCM) batteries. Metal extraction efficiencies were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, while reaction products were identified by X-ray diffraction analysis. Sulfation roasting using Na2SO4 resulted in low lithium recovery for both materials, with maximum extractions of 5.7% for LFP and 24.5% for NCM. In contrast, H2SO4-assisted roasting achieved high lithium recovery from NCM black mass, reaching 90.8%, 91.5%, and 88.5% at 45, 90, and 180 min at 550 °C, respectively, with lithium predominantly converted into water-soluble lithium sulfate. Lithium extraction from LFP black mass remained below 13% under all conditions. Statistical analysis confirmed that lithium recovery at 45 min was equivalent to longer residence times, while prolonged roasting increased manganese coextraction and altered cobalt and nickel behavior. Overall, sulfuric acid-assisted sulfation roasting is an efficient and energy-favorable route for lithium recovery from NCM black mass, whereas sulfation roasting is unsuitable for LFP materials, under the tested conditions. The results highlight the importance of cathode chemistry segregation and demonstrate the feasibility of reducing processing time without compromising lithium recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min16080778
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recycling Lithium-Ion Batteries: Comparison of Two Sulfation Roasting Routes for Efficient Lithium-First Recycling from LFP and NCM Black Mass

Felipe Antônio Lucca Sánchez, Hugo Marcelo Veit, Priscila Silva Silveira Camargo, Roberta dos Reis Costantin et al.
Minerals
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Recycling Lithium-Ion Batteries: Comparison of Two Sulfation Roasting Routes for Efficient Lithium-First Recycling from LFP and NCM Black Mass

Felipe Antônio Lucca Sánchez, Hugo Marcelo Veit, Priscila Silva Silveira Camargo, Roberta dos Reis Costantin, Maryanne Hoffmann Cardoso
article en

Abstract

The rapid increase in electric vehicles has increased the generation of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the need for efficient lithium recovery technologies. This study compared two distinct sulfation roasting routes, using sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) at 750 °C and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) at 550 °C, applied to black mass derived from lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NCM) batteries. Metal extraction efficiencies were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, while reaction products were identified by X-ray diffraction analysis. Sulfation roasting using Na2SO4 resulted in low lithium recovery for both materials, with maximum extractions of 5.7% for LFP and 24.5% for NCM. In contrast, H2SO4-assisted roasting achieved high lithium recovery from NCM black mass, reaching 90.8%, 91.5%, and 88.5% at 45, 90, and 180 min at 550 °C, respectively, with lithium predominantly converted into water-soluble lithium sulfate. Lithium extraction from LFP black mass remained below 13% under all conditions. Statistical analysis confirmed that lithium recovery at 45 min was equivalent to longer residence times, while prolonged roasting increased manganese coextraction and altered cobalt and nickel behavior. Overall, sulfuric acid-assisted sulfation roasting is an efficient and energy-favorable route for lithium recovery from NCM black mass, whereas sulfation roasting is unsuitable for LFP materials, under the tested conditions. The results highlight the importance of cathode chemistry segregation and demonstrate the feasibility of reducing processing time without compromising lithium recovery.

MineralsVol. 16(8)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recycling Lithium-Ion Batteries: Comparison of Two Sulfation Roasting Routes for Efficient Lithium-First Recycling from LFP and NCM Black Mass — Felipe Antônio Lucca Sánchez, Hugo Marcelo Veit, et al. · Minerals (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS