Navigating Boundaries of AI Use in Physical Education Journal Research Publications

This study investigates the status and regulatory nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage policies within mainstream English-language physical education journals. Ten peer-reviewed physical education journals were included. Results indicated a top-down, publisher-driven approach to AI policy formulation; however, the widespread adoption of these policies across the broader landscape of physical education journals remains limited. While AI authorship was strictly banned, regulations on content generation varied. Moreover, a regulatory asymmetry emerged, characterized by stringent confidentiality protocols for reviewers alongside comparatively lax standards for data privacy and security on the author’s side. Current governance relies on generic templates; thus, journals must transition to a human-centered framework establishing symmetric data protection and bias screening to safeguard integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quest
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2026.2707164
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Boundaries of AI Use in Physical Education Journal Research Publications

Timothy Lynch, Xiaofen D. Hamilton, Mark F. Hamilton, Beichen Lu et al.
Quest
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Navigating Boundaries of AI Use in Physical Education Journal Research Publications

Timothy Lynch, Xiaofen D. Hamilton, Mark F. Hamilton, Beichen Lu, Chenhao Wu, Yucen Li, Yanlei Su
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the status and regulatory nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage policies within mainstream English-language physical education journals. Ten peer-reviewed physical education journals were included. Results indicated a top-down, publisher-driven approach to AI policy formulation; however, the widespread adoption of these policies across the broader landscape of physical education journals remains limited. While AI authorship was strictly banned, regulations on content generation varied. Moreover, a regulatory asymmetry emerged, characterized by stringent confidentiality protocols for reviewers alongside comparatively lax standards for data privacy and security on the author’s side. Current governance relies on generic templates; thus, journals must transition to a human-centered framework establishing symmetric data protection and bias screening to safeguard integrity.

Quest
George Washington University (US), Chungwoon University (KR), The Ohio State University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.