Navigating Boundaries of AI Use in Physical Education Journal Research Publications
This study investigates the status and regulatory nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage policies within mainstream English-language physical education journals. Ten peer-reviewed physical education journals were included. Results indicated a top-down, publisher-driven approach to AI policy formulation; however, the widespread adoption of these policies across the broader landscape of physical education journals remains limited. While AI authorship was strictly banned, regulations on content generation varied. Moreover, a regulatory asymmetry emerged, characterized by stringent confidentiality protocols for reviewers alongside comparatively lax standards for data privacy and security on the author’s side. Current governance relies on generic templates; thus, journals must transition to a human-centered framework establishing symmetric data protection and bias screening to safeguard integrity.
Authors
- Timothy Lynch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7096-541X)
- Xiaofen D. Hamilton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-4103)
- Mark F. Hamilton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1622-6480)
- Beichen Lu
- Chenhao Wu
- Yucen Li
- Yanlei Su
Institutions
- George Washington University (US)
- Chungwoon University (KR)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Quest
- Published
- 2026-07-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2026.2707164
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00