A Mile in Her Heels: Do Men and Women Agree on How Often Women Are Sexually Objectified?

Abstract Despite extensive research on women’s experiences of sexual objectification, no research has examined whether women and men are aligned in their estimates of how often women have these experiences. Across three studies (one preregistered), we examined discrepancies between how often women reported experiencing sexual objectification and how often men believed women experienced this type of sexual objectification. Participants estimated frequency using a verbally anchored response scale (“ never ” to “ almost always ”) and a numeric count (e.g., times per week). In Studies 1 and 2, men’s estimates of how often women experience sexual objectification were significantly higher than women’s reports. In Studies 2 and 3, women’s estimates for how often the “average young woman” experiences sexual objectification were significantly higher than men’s estimates for overt sexual objectification (e.g., catcalling), but significantly lower than men’s estimates for covert sexual objectification (e.g., leering). An analysis of participants’ explanations for this pattern revealed gendered differences in reasons for this discrepancy. This work points to a disconnect between how men and women perceive women’s experience of sexual objectification in their everyday lives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex Roles
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-026-01674-x
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mile in Her Heels: Do Men and Women Agree on How Often Women Are Sexually Objectified?

Renee Engeln, Olivia Foster‐Gimbel
Sex Roles
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

A Mile in Her Heels: Do Men and Women Agree on How Often Women Are Sexually Objectified?

Renee Engeln, Olivia Foster‐Gimbel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite extensive research on women’s experiences of sexual objectification, no research has examined whether women and men are aligned in their estimates of how often women have these experiences. Across three studies (one preregistered), we examined discrepancies between how often women reported experiencing sexual objectification and how often men believed women experienced this type of sexual objectification. Participants estimated frequency using a verbally anchored response scale (“ never ” to “ almost always ”) and a numeric count (e.g., times per week). In Studies 1 and 2, men’s estimates of how often women experience sexual objectification were significantly higher than women’s reports. In Studies 2 and 3, women’s estimates for how often the “average young woman” experiences sexual objectification were significantly higher than men’s estimates for overt sexual objectification (e.g., catcalling), but significantly lower than men’s estimates for covert sexual objectification (e.g., leering). An analysis of participants’ explanations for this pattern revealed gendered differences in reasons for this discrepancy. This work points to a disconnect between how men and women perceive women’s experience of sexual objectification in their everyday lives.

Sex RolesVol. 92(4)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Northwestern University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.