Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Obesity: Reassessing Risk, Safety, and Success

Background: Obesity is a major independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), contributing to adverse outcomes and complicating rhythm control. While lifestyle modification is recommended, catheter ablation remains central to management. Conventional thermal ablation techniques often yield suboptimal results in obese patients due to anatomical and biophysical challenges. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a novel non-thermal modality, may overcome these limitations. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase identified observational cohort studies (2017–2026) evaluating PFA outcomes in obese AF patients or across BMI categories. Four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Findings on AF recurrence were heterogeneous. Recurrence rates appeared lower with PFA compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), though differences were not statistically significant. In a PFA-only study, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence did not vary across BMI categories. Compared with cryoballoon ablation (CBA), one matched-cohort study demonstrated significantly higher one-year freedom from AF with PFA-PVI, whereas another reported no difference. Left atrial epicardial adipose tissue (LA EAT) emerged as the only independent predictor of recurrence in PFA patients, suggesting electrical field perturbation by fat tissue. Radiation exposure was lower with PFA than CBA, while fluoroscopy time and periprocedural complications were comparable across groups. Conclusions: Current observational evidence suggests that PFA may be a feasible and safe option for AF ablation in overweight and obese patients, with outcomes comparable to conventional ablation techniques. However, comparative efficacy and long-term safety remain uncertain. Obesity-related adipose hypertrophy, systemic inflammation, and atrial remodeling may alter electric field distribution, contributing to variable recurrence outcomes. Larger prospective and randomized trials are warranted to define the long-term role of PFA in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15155866
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Obesity: Reassessing Risk, Safety, and Success

Dicky Armein Hanafy, Sunu Budhi Raharjo, Yoga Yuniadi, Dony Y. Hermanto et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Obesity: Reassessing Risk, Safety, and Success

Dicky Armein Hanafy, Sunu Budhi Raharjo, Yoga Yuniadi, Dony Y. Hermanto, Ridwan R. Waliyuddin
article en

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a major independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), contributing to adverse outcomes and complicating rhythm control. While lifestyle modification is recommended, catheter ablation remains central to management. Conventional thermal ablation techniques often yield suboptimal results in obese patients due to anatomical and biophysical challenges. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a novel non-thermal modality, may overcome these limitations. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase identified observational cohort studies (2017–2026) evaluating PFA outcomes in obese AF patients or across BMI categories. Four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Findings on AF recurrence were heterogeneous. Recurrence rates appeared lower with PFA compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), though differences were not statistically significant. In a PFA-only study, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence did not vary across BMI categories. Compared with cryoballoon ablation (CBA), one matched-cohort study demonstrated significantly higher one-year freedom from AF with PFA-PVI, whereas another reported no difference. Left atrial epicardial adipose tissue (LA EAT) emerged as the only independent predictor of recurrence in PFA patients, suggesting electrical field perturbation by fat tissue. Radiation exposure was lower with PFA than CBA, while fluoroscopy time and periprocedural complications were comparable across groups. Conclusions: Current observational evidence suggests that PFA may be a feasible and safe option for AF ablation in overweight and obese patients, with outcomes comparable to conventional ablation techniques. However, comparative efficacy and long-term safety remain uncertain. Obesity-related adipose hypertrophy, systemic inflammation, and atrial remodeling may alter electric field distribution, contributing to variable recurrence outcomes. Larger prospective and randomized trials are warranted to define the long-term role of PFA in this high-risk population.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(15)
University of Indonesia (ID), Pembuluh Darah Harapan Kita (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.