Human–AI Co-Regulation in Adaptive Learning: Developing GPT-Supported Self-Regulated Learning Models

<ns5:p>Background The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence into higher education has created new opportunities for supporting adaptive learning and self-regulated learning. However, existing adaptive learning systems primarily emphasize automated personalization and feedback, with limited attention to how learners and artificial intelligence collaboratively regulate learning processes. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a GPT-supported Human–AI Co-Regulation model to enhance self-regulated learning, metacognitive reflection, and adaptive engagement in higher education. Methods A Design-Based Research approach integrated with mixed methods and learning analytics was employed. The quantitative phase involved 214 undergraduate students, while 24 participants were included in the qualitative phase through interviews, reflective journals, classroom observations, and analysis of artificial intelligence interactions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired-sample t-tests, structural relationship analysis, and learning analytics visualization. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results The findings demonstrated significant improvements across all dimensions of self-regulated learning following implementation of the GPT-supported Human–AI Co-Regulation model. Metacognitive regulation showed the largest improvement (Δ = 0.98, p &lt; 0.001), followed by reflective thinking and self-monitoring. Learning analytics revealed substantial increases in GPT interaction frequency (105.2%), adaptive pathway utilization (51.9%), reflective prompt responses (48.3%), and task completion rates (27.2%) across iterative implementation cycles. Structural relationship analysis indicated that metacognitive reflection (β = 0.45, p &lt; 0.001) and Human–AI interaction quality (β = 0.42, p &lt; 0.001) were strong predictors of self-regulated learning outcomes. Qualitative findings showed that learners increasingly perceived GPT as a collaborative cognitive partner that supported planning, monitoring, reflection, and adaptive learning decisions. Conclusions The study extends self-regulated learning and adaptive learning theories by introducing a Human–AI collaborative regulation perspective. The findings highlight the value of integrating generative artificial intelligence, learning analytics, reflective prompting, and adaptive feedback mechanisms to support sustainable, learner-centered, and adaptive higher education environments.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.183470.1
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human–AI Co-Regulation in Adaptive Learning: Developing GPT-Supported Self-Regulated Learning Models

Muh Husein Baysha, Endah Resnandari Puji Astuti, Ridho Frihastama, Ferdinan Ivan Sangkop et al.
F1000Research
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Human–AI Co-Regulation in Adaptive Learning: Developing GPT-Supported Self-Regulated Learning Models

Muh Husein Baysha, Endah Resnandari Puji Astuti, Ridho Frihastama, Ferdinan Ivan Sangkop, Farid Helmi, Anik Ghufron, Herman Dwi Surjono
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>Background The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence into higher education has created new opportunities for supporting adaptive learning and self-regulated learning. However, existing adaptive learning systems primarily emphasize automated personalization and feedback, with limited attention to how learners and artificial intelligence collaboratively regulate learning processes. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a GPT-supported Human–AI Co-Regulation model to enhance self-regulated learning, metacognitive reflection, and adaptive engagement in higher education. Methods A Design-Based Research approach integrated with mixed methods and learning analytics was employed. The quantitative phase involved 214 undergraduate students, while 24 participants were included in the qualitative phase through interviews, reflective journals, classroom observations, and analysis of artificial intelligence interactions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired-sample t-tests, structural relationship analysis, and learning analytics visualization. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results The findings demonstrated significant improvements across all dimensions of self-regulated learning following implementation of the GPT-supported Human–AI Co-Regulation model. Metacognitive regulation showed the largest improvement (Δ = 0.98, p &lt; 0.001), followed by reflective thinking and self-monitoring. Learning analytics revealed substantial increases in GPT interaction frequency (105.2%), adaptive pathway utilization (51.9%), reflective prompt responses (48.3%), and task completion rates (27.2%) across iterative implementation cycles. Structural relationship analysis indicated that metacognitive reflection (β = 0.45, p &lt; 0.001) and Human–AI interaction quality (β = 0.42, p &lt; 0.001) were strong predictors of self-regulated learning outcomes. Qualitative findings showed that learners increasingly perceived GPT as a collaborative cognitive partner that supported planning, monitoring, reflection, and adaptive learning decisions. Conclusions The study extends self-regulated learning and adaptive learning theories by introducing a Human–AI collaborative regulation perspective. The findings highlight the value of integrating generative artificial intelligence, learning analytics, reflective prompting, and adaptive feedback mechanisms to support sustainable, learner-centered, and adaptive higher education environments.</ns5:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Yogyakarta State University (ID), University of Mataram (ID), Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta (ID), Universitas 45 Mataram (ID)
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.