Biodiversity Strategies in Action—Empirical Evidence From the Food Value Chain

ABSTRACT There is an increasing need for better understanding of firm activities that contribute to biodiversity preservation. Panwar, Ober, and Pinkse offer a valuable typology of corporate biodiversity protection strategies based on temporal and spatial dimensions, namely, the preloss (proactive) strategies of conservation and compensation, and the after‐loss (reactive) strategies of restoration and reparation. This empirical study uses Panwar's typology to categorize the biodiversity strategies of companies in Finland and New Zealand. The paper develops a framework that extends both temporal and spatial dimensions and includes the activities of land‐based producers, processors, manufacturers, and retailers across the food value chain. We find that when analyzing these strategies, focus needs to be on the specific activities and actions that companies adopt or encourage. Our study emphasizes the involvement of other actors (stakeholders) in corporate biodiversity protection efforts and activities at different stages of strategy implementation, namely, preassessment, biodiversity‐supportive action, and postaction appraisal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71352
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity Strategies in Action—Empirical Evidence From the Food Value Chain

Sini Laari, Joanna Scott‐Kennel, Asta Salmi
Business Strategy and the Environment
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Biodiversity Strategies in Action—Empirical Evidence From the Food Value Chain

Sini Laari, Joanna Scott‐Kennel, Asta Salmi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is an increasing need for better understanding of firm activities that contribute to biodiversity preservation. Panwar, Ober, and Pinkse offer a valuable typology of corporate biodiversity protection strategies based on temporal and spatial dimensions, namely, the preloss (proactive) strategies of conservation and compensation, and the after‐loss (reactive) strategies of restoration and reparation. This empirical study uses Panwar's typology to categorize the biodiversity strategies of companies in Finland and New Zealand. The paper develops a framework that extends both temporal and spatial dimensions and includes the activities of land‐based producers, processors, manufacturers, and retailers across the food value chain. We find that when analyzing these strategies, focus needs to be on the specific activities and actions that companies adopt or encourage. Our study emphasizes the involvement of other actors (stakeholders) in corporate biodiversity protection efforts and activities at different stages of strategy implementation, namely, preassessment, biodiversity‐supportive action, and postaction appraisal.

Business Strategy and the Environment
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Turku (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
University of Waikato, University of Auckland
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.