Both Restricted and Excessive Foetal Growth Increase the Odds of Failing Early Language Screening: A Register Study

AIM: To investigate whether birth size for gestational age is associated with failure at language screening in early childhood. METHODS: This population-based cohort study used linked national register data from Sweden. Children born between 2018 and 2023 who had undergone language screening at 2 years 4 months to 3 years 3 months of age were included (n = 194 637; 94 051 females, 100 586 males). Logistic regression estimated associations between birth size for gestational age and screening failure, with children born appropriate for gestational age as the reference group, adjusting for sex, preterm birth, parental education, maternal smoking, and parental country of birth. RESULTS: Overall, 12% of children failed the language screening. Children born small for gestational age had higher odds of failure than appropriate for gestational age children (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.54), as did children born large for gestational age (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.33). Male sex, preterm birth, lower parental education, maternal smoking, and having two foreign-born parents were each associated with screening failure. CONCLUSIONS: Both restricted and excessive foetal growth were associated with increased likelihood of failing language screening, suggesting that deviations from typical foetal growth patterns may affect language development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Paediatrica
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70712
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Both Restricted and Excessive Foetal Growth Increase the Odds of Failing Early Language Screening: A Register Study

Anna Fäldt, Anton Dahlberg, Isabelle Liljekvist
Acta Paediatrica
Language Development and Disorders
article

Both Restricted and Excessive Foetal Growth Increase the Odds of Failing Early Language Screening: A Register Study

Anna Fäldt, Anton Dahlberg, Isabelle Liljekvist
article en

Abstract

AIM: To investigate whether birth size for gestational age is associated with failure at language screening in early childhood. METHODS: This population-based cohort study used linked national register data from Sweden. Children born between 2018 and 2023 who had undergone language screening at 2 years 4 months to 3 years 3 months of age were included (n = 194 637; 94 051 females, 100 586 males). Logistic regression estimated associations between birth size for gestational age and screening failure, with children born appropriate for gestational age as the reference group, adjusting for sex, preterm birth, parental education, maternal smoking, and parental country of birth. RESULTS: Overall, 12% of children failed the language screening. Children born small for gestational age had higher odds of failure than appropriate for gestational age children (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.30-1.54), as did children born large for gestational age (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.33). Male sex, preterm birth, lower parental education, maternal smoking, and having two foreign-born parents were each associated with screening failure. CONCLUSIONS: Both restricted and excessive foetal growth were associated with increased likelihood of failing language screening, suggesting that deviations from typical foetal growth patterns may affect language development.

Acta Paediatrica
Uppsala University (SE)
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.