Global Public Perceptions of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

INTRODUCTION: Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) is a reconstructive technique that restores form and function in patients with severe tissue loss from trauma, burns, tumors, or congenital anomalies. Despite improving clinical outcomes, public understanding and acceptance remain barriers to widespread public acceptance. This systematic review examines global public perceptions of VCA, focusing on demographic, cultural, religious, and educational influences on donation. METHODS: A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted in June 2025 across PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included original surveys or mixed-methods research involving nonexpert participants who reported willingness to donate to VCA. Excluded were studies limited to experts, discussion articles, reviews, abstracts, or commentaries. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 19,023 respondents from 8 countries. Overall, there was a lower pooled willingness to donate facial VCA than hand VCA, with pooled willingness estimates of 47.9% and 54.8%, respectively. In contrast, willingness to receive VCA was higher overall, with pooled willingness estimates of 65.6% for facial transplantation and 72.4% for hand transplantation. Religious differences were evident: Christian and agnostic respondents were generally more willing to donate, whereas Muslim respondents were less willing. Racial differences were also noted, with White respondents more likely to donate. In contrast, Black and Asian respondents were less likely to indicate willingness to donate. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides the first comprehensive synthesis of global survey data on public perceptions of VCA. Nearly half of the respondents reported willingness to donate, with higher acceptance of hand donation than of face donation. Racial, ethnic, and religious factors shape attitudes, underscoring the need for culturally tailored educational strategies to improve donation acceptance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004831
Primary Topic
Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Public Perceptions of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Alexis Gursky, Aditya Arkalgud, Priyanka Pulvender, Claire Olivas et al.
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
article

Global Public Perceptions of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Alexis Gursky, Aditya Arkalgud, Priyanka Pulvender, Claire Olivas, Paul Sheriff, Sergio Segrera, Neil Menghani, Hailey P. Wyatt, Eduardo D. Rodriguez, Anandhini Narayanan
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) is a reconstructive technique that restores form and function in patients with severe tissue loss from trauma, burns, tumors, or congenital anomalies. Despite improving clinical outcomes, public understanding and acceptance remain barriers to widespread public acceptance. This systematic review examines global public perceptions of VCA, focusing on demographic, cultural, religious, and educational influences on donation. METHODS: A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted in June 2025 across PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included original surveys or mixed-methods research involving nonexpert participants who reported willingness to donate to VCA. Excluded were studies limited to experts, discussion articles, reviews, abstracts, or commentaries. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 19,023 respondents from 8 countries. Overall, there was a lower pooled willingness to donate facial VCA than hand VCA, with pooled willingness estimates of 47.9% and 54.8%, respectively. In contrast, willingness to receive VCA was higher overall, with pooled willingness estimates of 65.6% for facial transplantation and 72.4% for hand transplantation. Religious differences were evident: Christian and agnostic respondents were generally more willing to donate, whereas Muslim respondents were less willing. Racial differences were also noted, with White respondents more likely to donate. In contrast, Black and Asian respondents were less likely to indicate willingness to donate. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides the first comprehensive synthesis of global survey data on public perceptions of VCA. Nearly half of the respondents reported willingness to donate, with higher acceptance of hand donation than of face donation. Racial, ethnic, and religious factors shape attitudes, underscoring the need for culturally tailored educational strategies to improve donation acceptance.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
NYU Langone Health (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.