Improvement in Pain Neuroscience Knowledge and Patient Perceptions Following a One‐Day Multidisciplinary Pain Education Program

BACKGROUND: Pain neuroscience education is recognized as a core component of multidisciplinary chronic pain management. Although meta-analyses report small to medium clinical benefits across a range of chronic pain conditions and delivery settings, further evidence is needed to support implementation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in knowledge of pain neurophysiology and patient perceptions following participation in a single-session, multidisciplinary "Introduction to Pain Management" (IPM) program delivered within a tertiary pain service. METHODS: This quality improvement study examined outcomes from patients attending one of 16 IPM sessions delivered between February and December 2025. Participants completed the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (R-NPQ) immediately before and after the program. Rasch analysis was conducted to generate person estimates, and pre-post changes were analyzed using the paired-sample t-test. A post-program survey assessed perceived relevance, clarity, and intended use of self-management strategies. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients who attended the program, paired Rasch person estimates were available for 158 patients following exclusion of those with extreme Rasch scores. Participation in the IPM program was associated with a statistically significant increase in knowledge of pain neurophysiology (p < 0.001), with a moderate-to-large effect size (d = 0.73). Post-program survey responses indicated high levels of perceived relevance, clarity, and intended use of self-management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a single-session, multidisciplinary pain education program was associated with immediate improvements in pain neurophysiology knowledge and positive patient perceptions. These findings support the role of brief, structured pain education as a foundational component of multidisciplinary tertiary chronic pain services. Further research is needed to determine whether improvements in pain neurophysiology knowledge are maintained over time and associated with longer-term clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70544
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improvement in Pain Neuroscience Knowledge and Patient Perceptions Following a One‐Day Multidisciplinary Pain Education Program

Helen Davis, Su Hoon Chan
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Improvement in Pain Neuroscience Knowledge and Patient Perceptions Following a One‐Day Multidisciplinary Pain Education Program

Helen Davis, Su Hoon Chan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain neuroscience education is recognized as a core component of multidisciplinary chronic pain management. Although meta-analyses report small to medium clinical benefits across a range of chronic pain conditions and delivery settings, further evidence is needed to support implementation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in knowledge of pain neurophysiology and patient perceptions following participation in a single-session, multidisciplinary "Introduction to Pain Management" (IPM) program delivered within a tertiary pain service. METHODS: This quality improvement study examined outcomes from patients attending one of 16 IPM sessions delivered between February and December 2025. Participants completed the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (R-NPQ) immediately before and after the program. Rasch analysis was conducted to generate person estimates, and pre-post changes were analyzed using the paired-sample t-test. A post-program survey assessed perceived relevance, clarity, and intended use of self-management strategies. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients who attended the program, paired Rasch person estimates were available for 158 patients following exclusion of those with extreme Rasch scores. Participation in the IPM program was associated with a statistically significant increase in knowledge of pain neurophysiology (p < 0.001), with a moderate-to-large effect size (d = 0.73). Post-program survey responses indicated high levels of perceived relevance, clarity, and intended use of self-management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a single-session, multidisciplinary pain education program was associated with immediate improvements in pain neurophysiology knowledge and positive patient perceptions. These findings support the role of brief, structured pain education as a foundational component of multidisciplinary tertiary chronic pain services. Further research is needed to determine whether improvements in pain neurophysiology knowledge are maintained over time and associated with longer-term clinical outcomes.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 32(5)
Murdoch University (AU), Western Hospital (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.