Targeted behavioural and microclimate data collection substantially improves biophysical model predictions of energy expenditure in wild birds

Abstract Energy is fundamental for life and accurately predicting animals' energy expenditure under changing environments is central to ecology and global change biology. Energy expenditure in free‐living animals can be directly quantified using the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique or estimated by extrapolating respirometric measurements of metabolic rates or modelled using biophysical principles. However, the accuracy of these latter approaches depends on data quality and model parameterisation. We evaluated respirometry extrapolations and biophysical models for estimating daily energy expenditure (DEE) in a free‐living bird, the Southern Pied Babbler ( Turdoides bicolor ) against DLW measurements. Respirometry extrapolations and biophysical models were parameterised using: (a) assumed animal behaviour and assumed operative temperature ( T e ), (b) assumed animal behaviour and measured T e , (c) fine scale (focal) observations of behaviour under natural conditions and measured T e , or (d) coarse scale (scan) behaviour observations and measured T e . We then quantified the minimum field‐collected data needed to accurately predict measured DEE across a range of daily maximum air temperatures ( T air ). Models parameterised with assumed behaviours and T e failed to predict DEE with 95% confidence across all T air values. Biophysical models using focal observations and measured T e closely matched DLW measurements (within 94.1%–95.3% of measured DEE), while scan observations reduced accuracy (within 81.7%–88.1% of measured DEE). Respirometry extrapolations using focal or scan observations and measured T e predicted DEE within 82.1%–88.9% and 69.0%–87.1% of observed values, respectively. Varying behavioural data inputs showed that improving the accuracy of DEE predictions does not require exhaustive sampling. A targeted approach prioritising behavioural observations and T e measurements across representative T air can minimise effort in the field, while maintaining model accuracy. Biophysical models, increasingly used to predict species interactions, distributions, survival and fitness under environmental change, must be biologically relevant, well‐informed and accurate to reliably inform ecological and conservation research. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70412
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Targeted behavioural and microclimate data collection substantially improves biophysical model predictions of energy expenditure in wild birds

Barry van Jaarsveld, Zenon J. Czenze, Shannon R. Conradie, Andrew E. McKechnie et al.
Functional Ecology
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Targeted behavioural and microclimate data collection substantially improves biophysical model predictions of energy expenditure in wild birds

Barry van Jaarsveld, Zenon J. Czenze, Shannon R. Conradie, Andrew E. McKechnie, Amanda R. Bourne, Susan J. Cunningham, Ryno Kemp, Amanda R. Ridley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Energy is fundamental for life and accurately predicting animals' energy expenditure under changing environments is central to ecology and global change biology. Energy expenditure in free‐living animals can be directly quantified using the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique or estimated by extrapolating respirometric measurements of metabolic rates or modelled using biophysical principles. However, the accuracy of these latter approaches depends on data quality and model parameterisation. We evaluated respirometry extrapolations and biophysical models for estimating daily energy expenditure (DEE) in a free‐living bird, the Southern Pied Babbler ( Turdoides bicolor ) against DLW measurements. Respirometry extrapolations and biophysical models were parameterised using: (a) assumed animal behaviour and assumed operative temperature ( T e ), (b) assumed animal behaviour and measured T e , (c) fine scale (focal) observations of behaviour under natural conditions and measured T e , or (d) coarse scale (scan) behaviour observations and measured T e . We then quantified the minimum field‐collected data needed to accurately predict measured DEE across a range of daily maximum air temperatures ( T air ). Models parameterised with assumed behaviours and T e failed to predict DEE with 95% confidence across all T air values. Biophysical models using focal observations and measured T e closely matched DLW measurements (within 94.1%–95.3% of measured DEE), while scan observations reduced accuracy (within 81.7%–88.1% of measured DEE). Respirometry extrapolations using focal or scan observations and measured T e predicted DEE within 82.1%–88.9% and 69.0%–87.1% of observed values, respectively. Varying behavioural data inputs showed that improving the accuracy of DEE predictions does not require exhaustive sampling. A targeted approach prioritising behavioural observations and T e measurements across representative T air can minimise effort in the field, while maintaining model accuracy. Biophysical models, increasingly used to predict species interactions, distributions, survival and fitness under environmental change, must be biologically relevant, well‐informed and accurate to reliably inform ecological and conservation research. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional Ecology
Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AU), University of Cape Town (ZA), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Utrecht University (NL), South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of New England (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.