Global Trends in Science and Mathematics Education: A Comparative Analysis of the Century of Turkiye Education Model and China’s 2022 Curriculum

ABSTRACT: Aim: This study compares the science and mathematics curricula of the Turkiye Century Education Model and China’s 2022 Compulsory Education Curriculum across key structural indicators.Methods: The study adopted a qualitative comparative design and examined official curriculum documents and related literature using document analysis.Findings: Both curricula are structured around holistic development, 21st-century competencies, literacy, and process-based assessment. The Türkiye education model prioritizes meaningful learning by simplifying content and linking it to daily life, grounded in the “Whole Person” paradigm. Conversely, the Chinese curriculum adopts a standardized, scalable teaching–learning process based on the “five educations together” approach and core competencies. In the Türkiye education model, sustainability is integrated into literacy and unit structures, while in China, it is framed within school–family–community cooperation. For assessment, the Türkiye education model constructs a process-oriented holistic approach (e.g., rubrics, performance tasks) as “evidence of learning,” whereas China’s system emphasizes standardized item banks and quality-monitoring mechanisms.Originality/Value: This study presents the first structured analysis comparing Turkiye’s 2024 education model and China's 2022 updated curricula on fundamental elements: aims, content, sustainability, and assessment. Providing significant insights for educational policy, the research also offers a coding scheme for future curriculum comparison studies

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1863052
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Trends in Science and Mathematics Education: A Comparative Analysis of the Century of Turkiye Education Model and China’s 2022 Curriculum

Tayfun Tutak, Mehmet Polat
Kuramsal Eğitimbilim
Educational Methods and Analysis
article

Global Trends in Science and Mathematics Education: A Comparative Analysis of the Century of Turkiye Education Model and China’s 2022 Curriculum

Tayfun Tutak, Mehmet Polat
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Aim: This study compares the science and mathematics curricula of the Turkiye Century Education Model and China’s 2022 Compulsory Education Curriculum across key structural indicators.Methods: The study adopted a qualitative comparative design and examined official curriculum documents and related literature using document analysis.Findings: Both curricula are structured around holistic development, 21st-century competencies, literacy, and process-based assessment. The Türkiye education model prioritizes meaningful learning by simplifying content and linking it to daily life, grounded in the “Whole Person” paradigm. Conversely, the Chinese curriculum adopts a standardized, scalable teaching–learning process based on the “five educations together” approach and core competencies. In the Türkiye education model, sustainability is integrated into literacy and unit structures, while in China, it is framed within school–family–community cooperation. For assessment, the Türkiye education model constructs a process-oriented holistic approach (e.g., rubrics, performance tasks) as “evidence of learning,” whereas China’s system emphasizes standardized item banks and quality-monitoring mechanisms.Originality/Value: This study presents the first structured analysis comparing Turkiye’s 2024 education model and China's 2022 updated curricula on fundamental elements: aims, content, sustainability, and assessment. Providing significant insights for educational policy, the research also offers a coding scheme for future curriculum comparison studies

Kuramsal EğitimbilimVol. 19(3)
Fırat University (TR), Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Educational Methods and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global Trends in Science and Mathematics Education: A Comparative Analysis of the Century of Turkiye Education Model and China’s 2022 Curriculum — Tayfun Tutak, Mehmet Polat · Kuramsal Eğitimbilim (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS