Epistemic injustice in preventative cancer care for transgender individuals in the United States

Introduction Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) people frequently pursue surgical or hormonal gender-affirming medical care (GAMC). While some guidelines acknowledge an impact of GAMC on cancer risk and management, the guidelines are relatively recent and draw on limited data in this area. There are knowledge gaps surrounding the intersection of GAMC and preventative cancer care that affect patient care and experience, which is particularly important for individuals with increased cancer risk.Methods To better understand the intersectional GAMC and preventative cancer care experiences of TGNB individuals, we conducted fourteen semi-structured interviews with TGNB United States (U.S.) residents with increased cancer risk. Using reflexive thematic analysis and applying an interpretivist lens, we conceptualized six themes.Results We found that (1) preventative cancer care and GAMC are intertwined; (2) trustworthiness of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and institutions impacts patient cancer care engagement; (3) cisnormative care infrastructure excludes TGNB patients; (4) institutions and HCPs lack knowledge specific to TGNB patients with increased cancer risk; (5) medical paternalism impedes TGNB bodily autonomy; and (6) rising transphobia in the U.S. sociopolitical landscape influences GAMC and preventative cancer care decisions.Discussion Our findings demonstrate how intersecting systemic barriers, including knowledge gaps, exclusionary care practices, and sociopolitical pressures, contribute to compounded inequities in preventative cancer care and GAMC for TGNB individuals. Epistemic injustice, manifesting as both a dismissal of TGNB patients’ lived experiences and a structural lack of relevant knowledge, underpins many of these challenges. This injustice undermines trust, autonomy, and access to affirming, effective care. Steps to address these injustices include improving HCP education, ensuring consent is fully informed, and making systemic changes in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Transgender Health
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2026.2707307
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemic injustice in preventative cancer care for transgender individuals in the United States

Kimberly Zayhowski, S Roth, Kathleen F. Mittendorf, Rebecca M. Harris et al.
International Journal of Transgender Health
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Epistemic injustice in preventative cancer care for transgender individuals in the United States

Kimberly Zayhowski, S Roth, Kathleen F. Mittendorf, Rebecca M. Harris, Kai Blumen, R. Quinn Weiner
article en

Abstract

Introduction Transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) people frequently pursue surgical or hormonal gender-affirming medical care (GAMC). While some guidelines acknowledge an impact of GAMC on cancer risk and management, the guidelines are relatively recent and draw on limited data in this area. There are knowledge gaps surrounding the intersection of GAMC and preventative cancer care that affect patient care and experience, which is particularly important for individuals with increased cancer risk.Methods To better understand the intersectional GAMC and preventative cancer care experiences of TGNB individuals, we conducted fourteen semi-structured interviews with TGNB United States (U.S.) residents with increased cancer risk. Using reflexive thematic analysis and applying an interpretivist lens, we conceptualized six themes.Results We found that (1) preventative cancer care and GAMC are intertwined; (2) trustworthiness of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and institutions impacts patient cancer care engagement; (3) cisnormative care infrastructure excludes TGNB patients; (4) institutions and HCPs lack knowledge specific to TGNB patients with increased cancer risk; (5) medical paternalism impedes TGNB bodily autonomy; and (6) rising transphobia in the U.S. sociopolitical landscape influences GAMC and preventative cancer care decisions.Discussion Our findings demonstrate how intersecting systemic barriers, including knowledge gaps, exclusionary care practices, and sociopolitical pressures, contribute to compounded inequities in preventative cancer care and GAMC for TGNB individuals. Epistemic injustice, manifesting as both a dismissal of TGNB patients’ lived experiences and a structural lack of relevant knowledge, underpins many of these challenges. This injustice undermines trust, autonomy, and access to affirming, effective care. Steps to address these injustices include improving HCP education, ensuring consent is fully informed, and making systemic changes in clinical settings.

International Journal of Transgender Health
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Spectrum Health (US), AbbVie (United States) (US), Corewell Health Blodgett Hospital (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.