Experimental Evaluation of Drum Design and Operating Parameters for Multi-Objective Optimization of Wheat Threshing

In wheat threshing, reducing total grain loss and energy consumption is crucial for both economic and sustainable food security. This study investigates the effects of threshing drum type (straight and helical row), drum peripheral speed (36.73–48.98 m s−1), and drum-concave clearance (35–50 mm) on total grain loss and specific fuel consumption in a stationary threshing machine using a full factorial design. The optimum machine settings (drum type, peripheral speed and drum–concave clearance) that simultaneously minimize these two outputs were then determined. We systematically compared three surrogate modelling approaches—Response Surface Model (RSM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—to identify the most effective method for small-dataset optimization in threshing machine design. The best model was selected through cross-validation, and optimization was performed using the NSGA-II multi-objective genetic algorithm. GPR yielded the highest prediction accuracy for both outputs (R2 in prediction data: 0.99 for total grain loss and 0.91 for specific fuel consumption). Multi-objective optimization revealed a conflict between the two objectives; the best balance was achieved for the helical drum at a peripheral speed of approximately 41.5 m s−1 and a drum–concave clearance of 50 mm (predicted total grain loss approximately 3.7%, specific fuel consumption approximately 2.98 mL kg−1). Compared to the straight-row drum, the helical drum provided lower losses and fuel consumption, as well as approximately 3.5 times wider safe operating range. It should be noted that this optimum was predicted by the surrogate model and agreed closely with the best measured treatment; it was not confirmed by an independent validation experiment. The results demonstrated that combining a surrogate model with a genetic algorithm is an effective tool for optimizing threshing machine parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16151603
Primary Topic
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Evaluation of Drum Design and Operating Parameters for Multi-Objective Optimization of Wheat Threshing

Kazım Çarman, N. Ungureanu, Ergün Çıtıl, V. Vlăduţ et al.
Agriculture
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
article

Experimental Evaluation of Drum Design and Operating Parameters for Multi-Objective Optimization of Wheat Threshing

Kazım Çarman, N. Ungureanu, Ergün Çıtıl, V. Vlăduţ, Hasan Özçelik
article en

Abstract

In wheat threshing, reducing total grain loss and energy consumption is crucial for both economic and sustainable food security. This study investigates the effects of threshing drum type (straight and helical row), drum peripheral speed (36.73–48.98 m s−1), and drum-concave clearance (35–50 mm) on total grain loss and specific fuel consumption in a stationary threshing machine using a full factorial design. The optimum machine settings (drum type, peripheral speed and drum–concave clearance) that simultaneously minimize these two outputs were then determined. We systematically compared three surrogate modelling approaches—Response Surface Model (RSM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—to identify the most effective method for small-dataset optimization in threshing machine design. The best model was selected through cross-validation, and optimization was performed using the NSGA-II multi-objective genetic algorithm. GPR yielded the highest prediction accuracy for both outputs (R2 in prediction data: 0.99 for total grain loss and 0.91 for specific fuel consumption). Multi-objective optimization revealed a conflict between the two objectives; the best balance was achieved for the helical drum at a peripheral speed of approximately 41.5 m s−1 and a drum–concave clearance of 50 mm (predicted total grain loss approximately 3.7%, specific fuel consumption approximately 2.98 mL kg−1). Compared to the straight-row drum, the helical drum provided lower losses and fuel consumption, as well as approximately 3.5 times wider safe operating range. It should be noted that this optimum was predicted by the surrogate model and agreed closely with the best measured treatment; it was not confirmed by an independent validation experiment. The results demonstrated that combining a surrogate model with a genetic algorithm is an effective tool for optimizing threshing machine parameters.

AgricultureVol. 16(15)
Selçuk University (TR), The National Institute of Research – Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.