A Comparative Time-Based Profit Analysis of Retinal and Cataract Surgery in Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Purpose: To evaluate the time-adjusted economics of retinal and cataract surgery in order to clarify how the dynamics of ambulatory surgery centers influence access to urgent care. Methods: A time-driven activity-based costing model integrating Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ambulatory surgery center reimbursement, intraservice times, and cost data from a provider was applied to 18 421 retinal and 880 448 cataract procedures (2021–2024). Reimbursement, cost, and profit were converted to per-minute values, and a financial efficiency coefficient was used to quantify time-adjusted profitability. Variation in time and overhead allocation was assessed with sensitivity analyses. Results: Retinal procedures required 76.1 minutes vs 20.8 minutes for cataract surgery (ratio, 3.65). Time-normalized metrics favored cataract surgery, with reimbursement, cost, and profits per minute of $52.63, $29.28, and $23.35, compared with retinal procedures’ $24.61, $16.22, and $8.40. The profit per minute for retinal procedures was 36% of the cataract profit. The financial efficiency coefficient was 0.098, indicating retinal surgery was less than 10% efficient after adjusting for operative duration. Parity would require reducing operative time to 7.5 minutes or increasing reimbursement by $61.05 per minute (~71%). No retinal Current Procedural Terminology code achieved a financial efficiency coefficient ≥1. Block modeling showed adding 2 retinal cases to a cataract block converted a margin to a loss, with retinal blocks generating losses approaching $5,908. Conclusions: Although ambulatory surgery center reimbursement was higher for retinal than cataract surgery and the cost per minute was lower for retinal surgery, cataract surgery was more profitable per minute. These findings underscore the need for reform of time-based reimbursement that reflects the complexity of retinal surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Published
2026-07-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264261469011
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Time-Based Profit Analysis of Retinal and Cataract Surgery in Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Nimesh A. Patel, Ella H. Leung, F. Folgar, Calvin Lutz et al.
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

A Comparative Time-Based Profit Analysis of Retinal and Cataract Surgery in Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Nimesh A. Patel, Ella H. Leung, F. Folgar, Calvin Lutz, Miguel Busquets, Michael Javaheri, Ghassan Ghorayeb, Hasenin Al-khersan, Philip Niles, Jill Blim, Anton Kolomeyer, Avni Finn, Michael Lai
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the time-adjusted economics of retinal and cataract surgery in order to clarify how the dynamics of ambulatory surgery centers influence access to urgent care. Methods: A time-driven activity-based costing model integrating Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ambulatory surgery center reimbursement, intraservice times, and cost data from a provider was applied to 18 421 retinal and 880 448 cataract procedures (2021–2024). Reimbursement, cost, and profit were converted to per-minute values, and a financial efficiency coefficient was used to quantify time-adjusted profitability. Variation in time and overhead allocation was assessed with sensitivity analyses. Results: Retinal procedures required 76.1 minutes vs 20.8 minutes for cataract surgery (ratio, 3.65). Time-normalized metrics favored cataract surgery, with reimbursement, cost, and profits per minute of $52.63, $29.28, and $23.35, compared with retinal procedures’ $24.61, $16.22, and $8.40. The profit per minute for retinal procedures was 36% of the cataract profit. The financial efficiency coefficient was 0.098, indicating retinal surgery was less than 10% efficient after adjusting for operative duration. Parity would require reducing operative time to 7.5 minutes or increasing reimbursement by $61.05 per minute (~71%). No retinal Current Procedural Terminology code achieved a financial efficiency coefficient ≥1. Block modeling showed adding 2 retinal cases to a cataract block converted a margin to a loss, with retinal blocks generating losses approaching $5,908. Conclusions: Although ambulatory surgery center reimbursement was higher for retinal than cataract surgery and the cost per minute was lower for retinal surgery, cataract surgery was more profitable per minute. These findings underscore the need for reform of time-based reimbursement that reflects the complexity of retinal surgery.

Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
West Virginia University (US), Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Niagara University (US), Inspira Medical Center Vineland (US), Elman Retina Group (US), Retina Associates of Kentucky (US), Retina Specialists (US), Retina Consultants of Texas (US), Carolina Eyecare Physicians (US), The Retina Center (US), Eye Care Associates (US), Beverly Hills Cardiology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.