Noninterest income, macroprudential policy and bank performance

Abstract Macroprudential policies have become crucial tools for maintaining financial stability, but their effect on banks’ noninterest income has not yet been examined. This is a paradox in light of results in the literature linking noninterest income to bank performance indicators such as risk and profitability. Using a global sample of 7395 banks over 1990–2022, we find macroprudential policies have a significant positive effect on noninterest income. Similar results are found for disaggregated samples by type of noninterest income, country development, bank size and pre and post the Global Financial Crisis, and in three robustness checks. However, stimulus from macroprudential policies to noninterest income, and especially its non-fee component, is found to adversely affect bank risk. Furthermore, while significant effects of noninterest income on profitability are generally positive, this is not the case for non-fee income. Our findings have important implications for central bankers, regulators and commercial bank management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Banking Regulation
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-026-00336-y
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Noninterest income, macroprudential policy and bank performance

Dennison Noel, E. Philip Davis, Dilruba Karim
Journal of Banking Regulation
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Noninterest income, macroprudential policy and bank performance

Dennison Noel, E. Philip Davis, Dilruba Karim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Macroprudential policies have become crucial tools for maintaining financial stability, but their effect on banks’ noninterest income has not yet been examined. This is a paradox in light of results in the literature linking noninterest income to bank performance indicators such as risk and profitability. Using a global sample of 7395 banks over 1990–2022, we find macroprudential policies have a significant positive effect on noninterest income. Similar results are found for disaggregated samples by type of noninterest income, country development, bank size and pre and post the Global Financial Crisis, and in three robustness checks. However, stimulus from macroprudential policies to noninterest income, and especially its non-fee component, is found to adversely affect bank risk. Furthermore, while significant effects of noninterest income on profitability are generally positive, this is not the case for non-fee income. Our findings have important implications for central bankers, regulators and commercial bank management.

Journal of Banking RegulationVol. 27(3)
Brunel University of London (GB), National Institute of Economic and Social Research (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Noninterest income, macroprudential policy and bank performance — Dennison Noel, E. Philip Davis, et al. · Journal of Banking Regulation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS