Practical guidance for Win Statistics and Tournament Methods for Multifaceted Outcomes in Stroke Research: Review and Recommendations

Most stroke trials conventionally use outcome measures that reflect a single point of concern, such as functional outcomes or neurological improvement. Such a focus has a limited capacity to reflect the holistic nature of clinical reality, where multiple facets of health are of importance.Other clinical areas are increasingly embracing alternative approaches that better reflect the multifaceted nature of health outcomes, driven by the development of Win Statistics methodology. These methods compare the outcomes for all possible pairs of patients from the treatment versus control group and summarise the treatment effect as a combination of proportions of such comparisons where the person from the treatment group has a better/worse outcome when compared to the person in the control group. In this context, "better outcome" is defined holistically, based on information collected across multiple health facets (e.g. mortality, symptom reduction and quality of life).Such approaches are highly applicable to stroke research. They are a direct extension of "Tournament Methods" that are already used to analyse modified Rankin Scale data, and several stroke trials have already adopted this new approach to better reflect the multifaceted nature of stroke. Despite this, there is little guidance available to stroke researchers who wish to make use of the approach. This article provides a review of how to effectively use Tournament Methods to reflect the multifaceted nature of stoke.We review how Tournament Methods may be used to estimate treatment effects that simultaneously consider multiple clinical outcomes.We describe methods that have been used within stroke to combine multiple clinical outcomes for Tournament Methods analysis, provide an overview of the effect size measure estimates commonly used to summarise treatment effects, and discuss both available statistical methods and software for the analysis, visualisation and reporting of Win Statistics. We provide practical recommendations for conducting and reporting statistical analyses under the Tournament Methods approach using published stroke trials as illustrative examples. We further present newly developed point-and-click software that provides easy access to statistical codes for conducting Tournament Methods analyses and facilitates the use of our recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Stroke
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930261475853
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical guidance for Win Statistics and Tournament Methods for Multifaceted Outcomes in Stroke Research: Review and Recommendations

Vignan Yogendrakumar, Hannah Tabitha Johns, Guillaume Turc, Anna Balabanski et al.
International Journal of Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Practical guidance for Win Statistics and Tournament Methods for Multifaceted Outcomes in Stroke Research: Review and Recommendations

Vignan Yogendrakumar, Hannah Tabitha Johns, Guillaume Turc, Anna Balabanski, Bruce C.V. Campbell, Kathryn S. Hayward, Terrence O’brien, Nathalie H. Launder, Michael D. Hill, Tolulope Sajobi, Lucy Vivash, Leonid Churilov
article en

Abstract

Most stroke trials conventionally use outcome measures that reflect a single point of concern, such as functional outcomes or neurological improvement. Such a focus has a limited capacity to reflect the holistic nature of clinical reality, where multiple facets of health are of importance.Other clinical areas are increasingly embracing alternative approaches that better reflect the multifaceted nature of health outcomes, driven by the development of Win Statistics methodology. These methods compare the outcomes for all possible pairs of patients from the treatment versus control group and summarise the treatment effect as a combination of proportions of such comparisons where the person from the treatment group has a better/worse outcome when compared to the person in the control group. In this context, "better outcome" is defined holistically, based on information collected across multiple health facets (e.g. mortality, symptom reduction and quality of life).Such approaches are highly applicable to stroke research. They are a direct extension of "Tournament Methods" that are already used to analyse modified Rankin Scale data, and several stroke trials have already adopted this new approach to better reflect the multifaceted nature of stroke. Despite this, there is little guidance available to stroke researchers who wish to make use of the approach. This article provides a review of how to effectively use Tournament Methods to reflect the multifaceted nature of stoke.We review how Tournament Methods may be used to estimate treatment effects that simultaneously consider multiple clinical outcomes.We describe methods that have been used within stroke to combine multiple clinical outcomes for Tournament Methods analysis, provide an overview of the effect size measure estimates commonly used to summarise treatment effects, and discuss both available statistical methods and software for the analysis, visualisation and reporting of Win Statistics. We provide practical recommendations for conducting and reporting statistical analyses under the Tournament Methods approach using published stroke trials as illustrative examples. We further present newly developed point-and-click software that provides easy access to statistical codes for conducting Tournament Methods analyses and facilitates the use of our recommendations.

International Journal of Stroke
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Inserm (FR), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Calgary (CA), Université Paris Cité (FR), Ottawa Hospital (CA), O'Brien Institute (AU), Ontario Stroke Network (CA), Accelerated Medical Diagnostics (United States) (US), Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (FR), Melbourne Health (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (AU), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (CA), Monash University (AU)
Australian Government, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.