Embracing sociology as an open science: A commentary on Aksoy and colleagues' position statement

In their recent Rationality and Society (May 2026) position statement, Aksoy and colleagues advocate that sociology should adopt open science values to be better integrated with its neighboring social science disciplines. In my commentary, I offer my unreserved support to their stance while extending the conversation to an institutional scale. I first summarize the concepts, values, and practices of open science; then, by synthesizing theoretical and empirical evidence, I present how social scientists across all disciplines face systemic challenges in implementing open science practices. Specifically, sociology lags behind its peer social science disciplines in both awareness of open science principles and adoption of its practices. Crucially, by comparing the policies of two internationally prominent social science institutions, I demonstrate how such a deficiency is not the result of individualistic laxity, but of collective institutional negligence. Ultimately, in solidarity with Aksoy and colleagues, I urge the sociology community to actively and extensively engage in open science discourse, embrace open science values, and adopt open science practices in their research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rationality and Society
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631261472367
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embracing sociology as an open science: A commentary on Aksoy and colleagues' position statement

M Wang
Rationality and Society
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
article

Embracing sociology as an open science: A commentary on Aksoy and colleagues' position statement

M Wang
article en

Abstract

In their recent Rationality and Society (May 2026) position statement, Aksoy and colleagues advocate that sociology should adopt open science values to be better integrated with its neighboring social science disciplines. In my commentary, I offer my unreserved support to their stance while extending the conversation to an institutional scale. I first summarize the concepts, values, and practices of open science; then, by synthesizing theoretical and empirical evidence, I present how social scientists across all disciplines face systemic challenges in implementing open science practices. Specifically, sociology lags behind its peer social science disciplines in both awareness of open science principles and adoption of its practices. Crucially, by comparing the policies of two internationally prominent social science institutions, I demonstrate how such a deficiency is not the result of individualistic laxity, but of collective institutional negligence. Ultimately, in solidarity with Aksoy and colleagues, I urge the sociology community to actively and extensively engage in open science discourse, embrace open science values, and adopt open science practices in their research.

Rationality and Society
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.