Association between bystander type and successful bystander-delivered shocks in urban Tokyo, Japan

Objective: To evaluate the association between bystander type and successful bystanderdelivered shocks among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods: This single-center, retrospective observational study included non-traumatic adult OHCA patients with witnessed and an initial shockable rhythm who were transported to our hospital between April 2013 and June 2024. The term "successful bystander-delivered shocks" was defined as use of an automated external defibrillator by a bystander before emergency medical services arrival. Bystanders were categorized as family members, lay bystanders, on-duty staff, or healthcare professionals. On-duty staff were defined as persons working at the scene at the time of OHCA, and lay bystanders as non-staff passers-by . The primary outcome was successful bystander-delivered shocks . Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: 285 patients were included. Median age was 59 [49-69] years, 254 (89.1%) were male, and 184 (64.6%) received bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The bystander was a family member in 54 cases, a lay bystander in 79 cases, on-duty staff in 131 cases, and a healthcare professional in 21 cases. Successful bystander-delivered shocks differed markedly by bystander type: 3.7% among family members, 36.7% among lay bystanders, 59.5% among on-duty staff, and 76.2% among healthcare professionals. In multivariable logistic regression, the adjusted odds ratios for successful bystander-delivered shocks by bystander type were on-duty staff, 2.29 [1.26-4.17]; healthcare professionals, 6.26 [1.96-19.9]; and family members, 0.08 [0.02-0.36], compared with lay bystanders. Conclusion: OHCA patients for whom the rescuing bystander was on-duty staff or a healthcare professional were significantly more likely to receive successful bystanderdelivered automated external defibrillator shocks than those rescued by lay bystanders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.26.119
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between bystander type and successful bystander-delivered shocks in urban Tokyo, Japan

Kasumi Shirasaki, Nozomi Toya, Minami Torai, Tasuku Hada et al.
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
article

Association between bystander type and successful bystander-delivered shocks in urban Tokyo, Japan

Kasumi Shirasaki, Nozomi Toya, Minami Torai, Tasuku Hada, Norio Otani, Shutaro Isokawa, Katsuhiro Horie, Yohei Okada, Yu Watanabe
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between bystander type and successful bystanderdelivered shocks among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods: This single-center, retrospective observational study included non-traumatic adult OHCA patients with witnessed and an initial shockable rhythm who were transported to our hospital between April 2013 and June 2024. The term "successful bystander-delivered shocks" was defined as use of an automated external defibrillator by a bystander before emergency medical services arrival. Bystanders were categorized as family members, lay bystanders, on-duty staff, or healthcare professionals. On-duty staff were defined as persons working at the scene at the time of OHCA, and lay bystanders as non-staff passers-by . The primary outcome was successful bystander-delivered shocks . Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: 285 patients were included. Median age was 59 [49-69] years, 254 (89.1%) were male, and 184 (64.6%) received bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The bystander was a family member in 54 cases, a lay bystander in 79 cases, on-duty staff in 131 cases, and a healthcare professional in 21 cases. Successful bystander-delivered shocks differed markedly by bystander type: 3.7% among family members, 36.7% among lay bystanders, 59.5% among on-duty staff, and 76.2% among healthcare professionals. In multivariable logistic regression, the adjusted odds ratios for successful bystander-delivered shocks by bystander type were on-duty staff, 2.29 [1.26-4.17]; healthcare professionals, 6.26 [1.96-19.9]; and family members, 0.08 [0.02-0.36], compared with lay bystanders. Conclusion: OHCA patients for whom the rescuing bystander was on-duty staff or a healthcare professional were significantly more likely to receive successful bystanderdelivered automated external defibrillator shocks than those rescued by lay bystanders.

Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Kyoto University (JP), St. Luke's International Hospital (JP), Kanazawa University Hospital (JP), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.