Improving Reproducibility of Eddy-Current-Based Coating Thickness Estimation with Printed Circuit Board-Based Differential Coils

The accurate determination of the thickness of the metallic coating on steel substrates is essential in industrial quality control. Eddy current testing offers a non-destructive solution by evaluating the impedance or mutual impedance of one or multiple coils. Analytical models exist in the literature for selected sensor configurations. Building on these models, a model-based estimation approach can be applied to derive an estimate for coating thickness and other relevant material and geometry parameters. Conventional setups typically employ wire-wound coils. However, manufacturing tolerances introduce discrepancies between nominal and actual coil geometries, which lead to deviations in the coating thickness estimate. A printed circuit board (PCB)-based coil with lithographically defined geometry achieves substantially tighter fabrication tolerances and higher repeatability than wire-wound coils. In this work, an analytical mutual impedance model for a differential multi-layer PCB pancake coil is derived and validated against established models in the literature with respect to forward modeling accuracy and model-based parameter estimation performance. Furthermore, experimental measurements with two-layer and eight-layer PCB differential coil systems produce parameter estimates with significantly better reproducibility than wire-wound coils. The experimental results show that the two-layer PCB coil achieves close agreement between the absolute estimated parameters and the reference values without requiring additional calibration, while maintaining high sensitivity to coating thickness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19153201
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Reproducibility of Eddy-Current-Based Coating Thickness Estimation with Printed Circuit Board-Based Differential Coils

Stefan Scheiblhofer, Stefan Schuster, Daniel Wöckinger, Gerd Bramerdorfer et al.
Materials
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Improving Reproducibility of Eddy-Current-Based Coating Thickness Estimation with Printed Circuit Board-Based Differential Coils

Stefan Scheiblhofer, Stefan Schuster, Daniel Wöckinger, Gerd Bramerdorfer, Norbert Gstöttenbauer, Martin Koll, Markus Peer, Bernhard Salcher, Johann Reisinger
article en

Abstract

The accurate determination of the thickness of the metallic coating on steel substrates is essential in industrial quality control. Eddy current testing offers a non-destructive solution by evaluating the impedance or mutual impedance of one or multiple coils. Analytical models exist in the literature for selected sensor configurations. Building on these models, a model-based estimation approach can be applied to derive an estimate for coating thickness and other relevant material and geometry parameters. Conventional setups typically employ wire-wound coils. However, manufacturing tolerances introduce discrepancies between nominal and actual coil geometries, which lead to deviations in the coating thickness estimate. A printed circuit board (PCB)-based coil with lithographically defined geometry achieves substantially tighter fabrication tolerances and higher repeatability than wire-wound coils. In this work, an analytical mutual impedance model for a differential multi-layer PCB pancake coil is derived and validated against established models in the literature with respect to forward modeling accuracy and model-based parameter estimation performance. Furthermore, experimental measurements with two-layer and eight-layer PCB differential coil systems produce parameter estimates with significantly better reproducibility than wire-wound coils. The experimental results show that the two-layer PCB coil achieves close agreement between the absolute estimated parameters and the reference values without requiring additional calibration, while maintaining high sensitivity to coating thickness.

MaterialsVol. 19(15)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Voestalpine (Austria) (AT)
Linz Center of Mechatronics
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.