Correcting Bodies: Eugenics Rhetoric and Twentieth-Century Ballet Manuals

This article approaches twentieth-century ballet manuals as cultural texts through which rhetorics of bodily correction might be read in relation to cisheteronormative, Eurocentric ideals that parallel eugenic thought. Drawing on seventy manuals found at two US university libraries, I analyze both linguistic and visual strategies: binary taxonomy, aesthetic judgments of defect and beauty, appeals to scientific authority, and visual regimes of whiteness and heteronormativity. I suggest that these rhetorics mirror core strategies of eugenic discourse: promoting the logic of improvement, conflating health with normative beauty, and disciplining bodies toward aspirational norms. I ask how the saturation of eugenic logics in early to mid-twentieth-century physical culture and health reform might be traced, resisted, or reflected within or alongside the rhetorical infrastructures of ballet pedagogy in the United States. Finally, I consider implications for contemporary ballet pedagogy, suggesting how we might recognize and interrupt these discourses in teaching.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dance Chronicle
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01472526.2026.2707042
Primary Topic
Diversity and Impact of Dance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correcting Bodies: Eugenics Rhetoric and Twentieth-Century Ballet Manuals

Chelsea Hilding
Dance Chronicle
Diversity and Impact of Dance
article

Correcting Bodies: Eugenics Rhetoric and Twentieth-Century Ballet Manuals

Chelsea Hilding
article en

Abstract

This article approaches twentieth-century ballet manuals as cultural texts through which rhetorics of bodily correction might be read in relation to cisheteronormative, Eurocentric ideals that parallel eugenic thought. Drawing on seventy manuals found at two US university libraries, I analyze both linguistic and visual strategies: binary taxonomy, aesthetic judgments of defect and beauty, appeals to scientific authority, and visual regimes of whiteness and heteronormativity. I suggest that these rhetorics mirror core strategies of eugenic discourse: promoting the logic of improvement, conflating health with normative beauty, and disciplining bodies toward aspirational norms. I ask how the saturation of eugenic logics in early to mid-twentieth-century physical culture and health reform might be traced, resisted, or reflected within or alongside the rhetorical infrastructures of ballet pedagogy in the United States. Finally, I consider implications for contemporary ballet pedagogy, suggesting how we might recognize and interrupt these discourses in teaching.

Dance Chronicle
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diversity and Impact of Dance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Correcting Bodies: Eugenics Rhetoric and Twentieth-Century Ballet Manuals — Chelsea Hilding · Dance Chronicle (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS