From Nature to the Divine: How Children’s Anthropomorphism of Non-Human Entities Relates to Concepts of God

Cognitive science of religion frameworks for understanding the development of religious concepts, like that of God, often highlight the important role of an underlying tendency to use an anthropomorphic heuristic. However, to our knowledge, research has yet to examine the extent to which individual differences in anthropomorphizing non-human non-religious entities (i.e. animals, nature, and technology) relate to anthropomorphizing God. In this study, we explored whether and how individual differences in children’s anthropomorphic reasoning (as measured by the IDAQ;) related to children’s concept of God while controlling for other factors previously found to be important (i.e. age, parental socialization, and social cognition). One hundred twenty-three parent-child dyads with children between the ages of 5 and 8 years from the Pacific Southwest of the United States participated. Overall, while children’s anthropomorphizing of animals was unrelated to their conceptualization of God as humanlike, children’s anthropomorphizing of technology and nature was significantly related. This study highlights the nuances in the domain-specific ways children may employ anthropomorphic reasoning to infer humanness in nonhuman religious entities. Further, our findings suggest that situational-contextual factors such as age, religious socialization, and social cognition play important roles in these reasoning patterns. Unpacking the domain-specificity of children’s anthropomorphic reasoning may improve the precision of frameworks for understanding religious concept formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognition and Development
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2026.2705212
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Nature to the Divine: How Children’s Anthropomorphism of Non-Human Entities Relates to Concepts of God

Anondah Saide, Nicholas Shaman, Rebekah Richert
Journal of Cognition and Development
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

From Nature to the Divine: How Children’s Anthropomorphism of Non-Human Entities Relates to Concepts of God

Anondah Saide, Nicholas Shaman, Rebekah Richert
article en

Abstract

Cognitive science of religion frameworks for understanding the development of religious concepts, like that of God, often highlight the important role of an underlying tendency to use an anthropomorphic heuristic. However, to our knowledge, research has yet to examine the extent to which individual differences in anthropomorphizing non-human non-religious entities (i.e. animals, nature, and technology) relate to anthropomorphizing God. In this study, we explored whether and how individual differences in children’s anthropomorphic reasoning (as measured by the IDAQ;) related to children’s concept of God while controlling for other factors previously found to be important (i.e. age, parental socialization, and social cognition). One hundred twenty-three parent-child dyads with children between the ages of 5 and 8 years from the Pacific Southwest of the United States participated. Overall, while children’s anthropomorphizing of animals was unrelated to their conceptualization of God as humanlike, children’s anthropomorphizing of technology and nature was significantly related. This study highlights the nuances in the domain-specific ways children may employ anthropomorphic reasoning to infer humanness in nonhuman religious entities. Further, our findings suggest that situational-contextual factors such as age, religious socialization, and social cognition play important roles in these reasoning patterns. Unpacking the domain-specificity of children’s anthropomorphic reasoning may improve the precision of frameworks for understanding religious concept formation.

Journal of Cognition and Development
University of California, Riverside (US), University of North Texas (US), Anne Arundel Community College (US)
John Templeton Foundation, University of California, Riverside
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.